The battered economy, constant political wrangling and inability of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration to improve people’s livelihoods and recognize the public’s pain have led many people to lose heart and become pessimistic about the nation and where it is headed.
It can be hard for people in Taiwan to view the nation’s future optimistically when they are treated daily to depressing and negative news reports, from stories about forced land expropriations and the government’s persistently arbitrary policymaking that diminishes sovereignty and national pride, to the erosion of press freedom and mass deficit spending increasing national debt, to name just a few.
Given the country’s oppressive past, Taiwanese for a long time seemed to have been growing increasingly numb to the blatant injustices they witnessed day in and day out.
Fortunately, this apathy has come to an end. However weary the spineless and incompetent Ma government may have made the people feel, leading individuals to feel helpless about improving their country, a growing majority of Taiwanese are no longer suffering in silence, choosing instead to come together and take matters into their own hands.
The land seizure executed by the Miaoli County Government in Jhunan Township’s (竹南) Dapu Borough (大埔) serves as an example of this burgeoning action. Though the county government attempted to stigmatize Dapu farmers by placing advertisements on the front pages of the nation’s major Chinese-language newspapers — using taxpayers’ money — netizens united to show their support for the villagers by issuing calls for rallies.
Another example can be seen in the case of the late army corporal Hung Chung-chiu (洪仲丘), who died while in military detention on July 4 in dubious circumstances. Rights group Citizen 1985 has set up a Facebook page seeking justice for Hung and has planned a protest in front of the Ministry of National Defense on Saturday, which it says more than 7,000 people have already pledged to take part in.
While some may worry about what they perceive as the government’s increasingly China-friendly policies, a recent Democratic Progressive Party survey showed that 78.4 percent of respondents disagreed that Taiwan and China are parts of one country. The poll also indicated that 77.6 percent identified themselves as Taiwanese, while only 10.1 percent regarded themselves as Chinese. These figures reflect a consensus that is forming among people in Taiwan that, in terms of national status, few feel a connection with those on the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
How could the public look past how often the nation’s politicians brandish the word “Taiwan” in their campaign speeches, showing their “national pride,” only to drop the name when presented with an opportunity to raise the nation’s visibility on the international stage?
Fortunately, Taiwanese are taking action, with or without the government’s help.
The latest manifestation of this concerted public action was a group of volunteers who, eager to raise Taiwan’s international profile, staged a flash mob chorus at Taipei 101. The YouTube clip of the flash mob (http://youtu.be/bbqY1P6KJmI) has taken the online community by storm and introduced many abroad to the beauty of Taiwan and its people.
In Taiwan, there are many pure and kind souls who are unselfish, passionate and ready to make an effort to help the voiceless, bring justice to the wronged and put “people’s diplomacy” into action to showcase the soft power that puts Taiwan on the map.
In the fight against injustices of all kinds, domestic and international, silence is not golden. All the examples cited above suggest that while Taiwan’s future may look bleak at times, there is hope yet — so long as Taiwanese use their own voices to make themselves and their country heard.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of