With great fanfare, Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) on Friday evening invited Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) and Miaoli County Commissioner Liu Cheng-hung (劉政鴻) to discuss the pending demolition of four farmers’ houses in Dapu (大埔), Miaoli County. The conclusion of the meeting was merely to call on Liu to “handle the matter appropriately” in accordance with previous decisions of the urban and rural planning division of the Ministry of the Interior. By passing the buck back to the county government, central government has once again demonstrated its ineptitude.
The Executive Yuan negotiations on Aug. 17, 2010, concluded that the houses should be preserved in their existing location. Jiang, then minister of the interior, attended the meeting and knows that the four principles concerning traffic safety and public safety, which he has come up with since, were neither discussed nor recorded at the 2010 meeting.
Jiang is just using this as a smokescreen for his negligent handling of the issue in 2010.
On July 17, 2010, farmers and their supporters from Dapu and other areas held an all-night protest on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. I accompanied representatives of the farmers’ self-help association to the Executive Yuan to negotiate. Wu, then premier, informed us of a plan to preserve the farmers’ houses in the existing location and compensate them with adjoining land. He urged then-Cabinet secretary-general Lin Join-sane (林中森) to give the departments concerned one month to come up with proposals to that effect.
On Aug. 26, Lin wrote to the Ministry of the Interior and the Miaoli County Government, saying: “After meeting with representatives of the protesting farmers for a second time on Aug. 17, we reached the preliminary conclusion that the buildings and the land on which they are built should be preserved in their present locations [and that] the property should be handled by means of special-case transfer or sale. Now I request the Ministry of the Interior to keep pressing the Miaoli County Government to handle the matter appropriately, as soon as possible.”
On Sept. 15, the Ministry of the Interior wrote to the Miaoli County Government saying: “The results of the aforementioned negotiations require the Miaoli County Government to cooperate by changing the urban plan, adjusting the zone expropriation and presenting the plan to the Executive Yuan for approval of transfer or sale in accordance with Article 44, Paragraph 1-4 of the Land Expropriation Act (土地徵收條例). Please proceed promptly.”
This series of events should prove that Jiang’s so-called four principles are a complete fabrication.
If the Executive Yuan, as the nation’s Cabinet and highest executive authority, has lawfully exercised the powers exclusively invested in it, then how can subordinate bodies like the Interior Ministry’s urban and rural planning division and local governments overturn its instructions or add their own conditions and restrictions?
When Jiang was minister of the interior, he also served as director of the urban and rural planning division. While he never attended its meetings to direct its handling of this issue, he exceeded his powers by examining the special-case transfer or sale plan that had been approved by the Executive Yuan. In doing so, he undermined the work Wu had done to assuage public discontent, which is why the government now faces a new wave of public anger and media pressure.
Now Wu and Jiang are asking Liu to handle the matter “appropriately,” though he can hardly be trusted to do so. This government really is completely hopeless.
Chan Shun-kuei is a lawyer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS