Last weekend, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and his US counterpart, Barack Obama, held a two-day summit in California.
Branded as “a new type of relations between big powers,” one issue attracted the most attention from the outside world.
According to media reports, Xi once again stated his view that the Pacific Ocean was wide enough to accommodate both China and the US.
It was the third time that Xi made the statement in the past year and a half. In addition to Xi’s statement, Chinese State Councilor Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) said at a briefing after the summit that the two countries should be able to find a new path that is different from the historical precedent of conflict and confrontation between the major powers.
In other words, as far as China is concerned, the joint management of the Pacific Ocean with the US will be a crucial component to this new relationship.
At the same time, Beijing is hoping that Washington will abandon the idea of using military force to contain China and that it accepts the possibility that China might replace the US as the world’s biggest power some day.
As far as Taiwan is concerned, the appearance and development of such a relationship could create two big problems.
First, if the US was to agree to jointly manage the Pacific Ocean with China, then China would likely move to take control of the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea — two regions that Beijing claims are part of China’s core interests.
Second, as China’s strength grows, as do the increasingly overlapping interests between China and the US, the question would be whether Washington is capable and willing enough to continue to play the role of security provider, which maintains the balance in the western Pacific region.
This is why, in the short term, Taiwan must gain a deeper understanding of the scope of this new type of relationship between China and the US and the issues such a relationship would involve.
It must also find ways to enhance communications and negotiations with the US to avoid a negative impact on Taiwan’s interests.
In the medium and long term, Taiwan must be well-prepared and flexible so that it can create new strategic value for itself as China and the US go through a process of strategic adjustments.
It must also make an effort to obtain the greatest benefits possible as a result of the dynamic inconsistencies between China and the US.
In addition, Taiwan should create even closer relations with neighboring countries throughout the region, especially Japan and India.
Doing so would relieve and counterbalance the pressure China is putting on Taiwan and the whole of East Asia.
In short, faced with a new type of relationship between China and the US, Taiwan must not remain aloof from the situation.
It certainly should not resign itself to fate.
Huang Tzu-wei is a researcher at the Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS