Last weekend, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and his US counterpart, Barack Obama, held a two-day summit in California.
Branded as “a new type of relations between big powers,” one issue attracted the most attention from the outside world.
According to media reports, Xi once again stated his view that the Pacific Ocean was wide enough to accommodate both China and the US.
It was the third time that Xi made the statement in the past year and a half. In addition to Xi’s statement, Chinese State Councilor Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) said at a briefing after the summit that the two countries should be able to find a new path that is different from the historical precedent of conflict and confrontation between the major powers.
In other words, as far as China is concerned, the joint management of the Pacific Ocean with the US will be a crucial component to this new relationship.
At the same time, Beijing is hoping that Washington will abandon the idea of using military force to contain China and that it accepts the possibility that China might replace the US as the world’s biggest power some day.
As far as Taiwan is concerned, the appearance and development of such a relationship could create two big problems.
First, if the US was to agree to jointly manage the Pacific Ocean with China, then China would likely move to take control of the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea — two regions that Beijing claims are part of China’s core interests.
Second, as China’s strength grows, as do the increasingly overlapping interests between China and the US, the question would be whether Washington is capable and willing enough to continue to play the role of security provider, which maintains the balance in the western Pacific region.
This is why, in the short term, Taiwan must gain a deeper understanding of the scope of this new type of relationship between China and the US and the issues such a relationship would involve.
It must also find ways to enhance communications and negotiations with the US to avoid a negative impact on Taiwan’s interests.
In the medium and long term, Taiwan must be well-prepared and flexible so that it can create new strategic value for itself as China and the US go through a process of strategic adjustments.
It must also make an effort to obtain the greatest benefits possible as a result of the dynamic inconsistencies between China and the US.
In addition, Taiwan should create even closer relations with neighboring countries throughout the region, especially Japan and India.
Doing so would relieve and counterbalance the pressure China is putting on Taiwan and the whole of East Asia.
In short, faced with a new type of relationship between China and the US, Taiwan must not remain aloof from the situation.
It certainly should not resign itself to fate.
Huang Tzu-wei is a researcher at the Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS