The Legislative Yuan began its extra session yesterday in what has now become a ritual: For the past few years, no legislative session has ended without the need for an additional session.
In addition, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said that as there were too many outstanding proposals, it has planned not one, but two extra sessions.
While legislative inefficiency occurs in many countries, the “extra session” phenomenon — unquestionably one of the trademarks of Taiwan’s legislature, along with occasional brawls — is a serious concern.
It brings to mind an issue that angers many employers: employees working overtime for no other reason than to receive overtime pay.
According to an estimate made by The Journalist magazine last year, one extra day of sessions costs NT$10.25 million (US$342,300). In other words, the extra two-week session is expected to cost taxpayers NT$143.5 million.
However, it is much more than an issue of money.
Lawmakers are called lawmakers for a reason — they make laws, which is the mandate bestowed upon them by millions of voters across the country.
Unfortunately, legislators have not been doing their job. Too often during sessions, lawmakers spend the time humiliating officials or asking irrelevant questions, knowing that the media — TV crews in particular — eagerly await their soundbites. They provide the “showmanship” that the media want, but that is a topic for another day.
Yet, those who do attend legislative committee meetings are still more commendable than those who do not even show up and believe that making connections in their constituencies is more important for winning elections than legislating.
If the Democratic Progressive Party has to worry about its lawmakers not attending committee meetings, the KMT has even more to worry about.
A lack of effort, along with political differences between parties, is why little was achieved in the regular session and most legislation that was passed has done so as part of package deals after cross-party negotiation.
Over the years, not even changes in the constituency map, the legislature’s structure nor internal regulations have changed this phenomenon.
The recent controversy over an amendment to the Accounting Act (會計法) has highlighted the absurdity and incompetence of lawmakers at an unprecedented level, with closed-door deals and a bizarre omission in the proposal’s text that was supposed to have exempted hundreds of university professors from charges of misusing receipts to claim government reimbursements.
Outraged at the secrecy, the blatant politicking and the sheer stupidity of the omission, the public finally made its voice heard, forcing an Executive Yuan veto and apologies from President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and all political parties.
In some cases, lawmakers do not make enough laws, as was the case in the recent industrial starch food scandal. Government agencies either found that there was no law regulating the matter, or else they had no idea which agency was actually in charge of the function.
If what has happened serves as any warning to legislators, the message is surely loud and clear: Lawmakers should be doing their jobs and not needing two extra sessions in which to do them.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
RSS