Ever since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office in 2008, the main guiding principle for Taiwan’s foreign relations has been to maintain close ties to the US, China and Japan. The nation’s relations with these powers are like three interconnected threads: When one is pulled, the others are affected and Taipei adjusts the length that it pulls a thread according to the situation.
However, it is a guiding principle, it is not set in stone. The evolution of US-China relations is like the turning of cogs: Once the main wheel — US-China relations — moves, the smaller cogs — the foreign relations strategies of Taiwan, the US, China and Japan — turn as a result.
Taiwan’s strategy has evolved within the context of China’s rise and the US’ “return” to Asia, and was underpinned by three assumptions: that China’s rise would necessarily heighten tensions between Washington and Beijing; that China’s emergence as a regional hegemon would produce regional friction between China and Japan; and that the US’ return to Asia would strengthen ties between the US and Japan.
Therefore, Taipei’s foreign relations strategy requires it to balance its relations with the other three countries. The government needs to be cautious when dealing with US-Taiwan relations, cross-strait relations and sovereignty disputes over the Diaoyutais (釣魚台). It is fine to improve cross-strait relations, but bearing in mind the political lines that cannot be crossed in regard to the US. Taiwan can improve US ties, but not at the expense of cross-strait relations. It can hold talks with Japan and China on the Diaoyutais, which Tokyo calls the Senkakus, but cannot overly side with China.
Given the mutual constraints in US-China relations, Taiwan’s three-way strategy, while a major step toward achieving its foreign relations objectives, undeniably hobbles its ties with China.
Last week, US President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) held an informal two-day summit, emerging with what Xinhua news agency described as “a new type of great powers relationship.”
Obama welcomed China’s rise, while China expressed the wish to build a non-confrontational relationship with the US. From here on, US-China relations are to take on a new character, evolving from the narrow mutual strategic partnership of the past to a more inclusive, diplomatic relationship between two powers. In addition, through cooperation on international issues, the political tensions between the two countries will gradually be alleviated. Therefore, as the US and China cooperate more, the importance of the Taiwan question and of cross-strait relations for the two powers will recede.
Naturally, this new relationship needs to be refined by confirming how the two countries are to cooperate on sensitive issues and how they will further cement their relationship as allies. Nevertheless, the US’ increasingly positive attitude toward China’s rise seems to be becoming part of the new international reality. One can therefore expect US-Taiwan relations to change too. Given this, the government would do well to consider the following:
First, political talks with China should not be seen as harming US-Taiwan relations. Second, strengthening Taiwan’s US arms procurements should not be interpreted as a step backward in the development of cross-strait relations. Third, joint initiatives between Taiwan and China on international issues should not be regarded as being necessarily against the US or Japan.
Faced with these changes, Taipei needs to do more than come up with a new foreign relations strategy, it should try to turn the developments to its advantage by using the rapprochement in US-China relations to promote cross-strait ties.
Tsai Zheng-jia is a division head at National Chengchi University’s Institute of International Relations.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s