May 20 marked President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) fifth year in office. Instead of seeing Ma give a speech like a president normally would on such an occasion, the public saw him nodding off at a Central Emergency Operation Center meeting.
However, if people could just show a little more sympathy and look at things from his perspective, the reason no speech was forthcoming was that the president did not really have any political achievements worthy of celebrating with the public.
Looking back over the past year or so, apart from a number of so-called “political reforms” that failed to win over the public, the most prominent things to have happened were the string of corruption scandals involving some of the president’s closest and most trusted aides.
These happened like a stack of dominos falling, with a shocking speed and number of people implicated.
Among the scandals that have affected his regime, the one attracting the most heated discussion was the ruling by the court of first instance on the corruption case involving former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世).
This was because the verdict handed down by the three Taipei District Court judges on April 30 was a blatant attempt to protect a corrupt official and get him off the hook.
Under heavy pressure from the public, the Special Investigation Division of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office appealed the sentence last month.
In their legal brief, prosecutors said that the nation should not be turned into a haven for elected representatives to promote their own greedy interests while using the excuse they are “serving voters.”
The brief also stated that the verdict could open the way for other legislators to follow in Lin’s footsteps because they believe they can do so with impunity.
Indeed, the judges who presided over Lin’s first hearing believed he was exempt under the Anti-Corruption Act (貪污治罪條例), because they said his lobbying actions had nothing to do with his official duties. This was even though he first served as the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) caucus whip and then was promoted to Cabinet secretary-general, after failing to be re-elected.
Even more ridiculous was the judges’ decision that the more than NT$30 million (US$1 million) in alleged bribes were “gifts” to Lin and that the money should therefore be returned to him.
Such a verdict is tantamount to setting a recommended price for lobbying by legislators. They might as well put up a sign saying “price for lobbying” on the entrance to the legislature, and maybe even offer discounts to people who have more than one thing they need the help of a legislator to “settle.”
In 2011, Citizen’s Congress Watch published a special report on stopping corruption in the legislature, because legislators are more often than not the group easiest to entice with bribes.
This is why all policymaking processes and any political donations that legislators receive should be made transparent. This is the only way to stop corruption.
If a second ruling on Lin’s case were to uphold the same verdict, this could well indicate all levels of representative bodies are corruption bases from which elected representatives can accept openly as many bribes as they want.
If this happens, Ma will go down in history as having achieved nothing but bad, and the nation might as well post a slogan at the Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport that reads: “Welcome to the Republic of Corruption (ROC) — Taiwan.”
Ku Chung-hwa is a standing board member of Citizen’s Congress Watch.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
RSS