May 20 marked President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) fifth year in office. Instead of seeing Ma give a speech like a president normally would on such an occasion, the public saw him nodding off at a Central Emergency Operation Center meeting.
However, if people could just show a little more sympathy and look at things from his perspective, the reason no speech was forthcoming was that the president did not really have any political achievements worthy of celebrating with the public.
Looking back over the past year or so, apart from a number of so-called “political reforms” that failed to win over the public, the most prominent things to have happened were the string of corruption scandals involving some of the president’s closest and most trusted aides.
These happened like a stack of dominos falling, with a shocking speed and number of people implicated.
Among the scandals that have affected his regime, the one attracting the most heated discussion was the ruling by the court of first instance on the corruption case involving former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世).
This was because the verdict handed down by the three Taipei District Court judges on April 30 was a blatant attempt to protect a corrupt official and get him off the hook.
Under heavy pressure from the public, the Special Investigation Division of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office appealed the sentence last month.
In their legal brief, prosecutors said that the nation should not be turned into a haven for elected representatives to promote their own greedy interests while using the excuse they are “serving voters.”
The brief also stated that the verdict could open the way for other legislators to follow in Lin’s footsteps because they believe they can do so with impunity.
Indeed, the judges who presided over Lin’s first hearing believed he was exempt under the Anti-Corruption Act (貪污治罪條例), because they said his lobbying actions had nothing to do with his official duties. This was even though he first served as the ruling Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) caucus whip and then was promoted to Cabinet secretary-general, after failing to be re-elected.
Even more ridiculous was the judges’ decision that the more than NT$30 million (US$1 million) in alleged bribes were “gifts” to Lin and that the money should therefore be returned to him.
Such a verdict is tantamount to setting a recommended price for lobbying by legislators. They might as well put up a sign saying “price for lobbying” on the entrance to the legislature, and maybe even offer discounts to people who have more than one thing they need the help of a legislator to “settle.”
In 2011, Citizen’s Congress Watch published a special report on stopping corruption in the legislature, because legislators are more often than not the group easiest to entice with bribes.
This is why all policymaking processes and any political donations that legislators receive should be made transparent. This is the only way to stop corruption.
If a second ruling on Lin’s case were to uphold the same verdict, this could well indicate all levels of representative bodies are corruption bases from which elected representatives can accept openly as many bribes as they want.
If this happens, Ma will go down in history as having achieved nothing but bad, and the nation might as well post a slogan at the Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport that reads: “Welcome to the Republic of Corruption (ROC) — Taiwan.”
Ku Chung-hwa is a standing board member of Citizen’s Congress Watch.
Translated by Drew Cameron
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS