Determined to kill or capture a murderous Mekong River drug lord, China’s security forces considered a tactic they had never tried before: calling a drone strike on his remote hideaway deep in the hills of Myanmar.
The attack did not happen — the man was later captured and brought to China for trial — but that authorities were considering such an option cast new light on China’s unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs) program, which has been percolating quietly for years and now appears to be moving into overdrive. Chinese aerospace firms have developed dozens of drones, many of which have appeared at air shows and military parades, including some that bear an uncanny resemblance to the Predator, Global Hawk and Reaper models used with deadly effect by the US Air Force and the CIA. Analysts say that although China still trails industry leaders thr US and Israel, its technology is maturing rapidly and is on the cusp of being ready for widespread use for surveillance and combat strikes.
“My sense is that China is moving into large-scale deployments of UAVs,” said Ian Easton, co-author of a recent report on Chinese drones for the Project 2049 Institute security think tank.
China’s move into large-scale drone deployment displays its military’s growing sophistication and could challenge US military dominance in the Asia-Pacific region. It also could elevate the threat to neighbors with territorial disputes with Beijing, including Taiwan, Vietnam, Japan, India and the Philippines. China says its drones are capable of carrying bombs and missiles as well as conducting reconnaissance, potentially turning them into offensive weapons in a border conflict.
China’s increased use of drones also adds to concerns about the lack of internationally recognized standards for drone attacks. The US has widely employed drones as a means of eliminating terror suspects in Pakistan and the Arabian Peninsula.
“China is following the precedent set by the US. The thinking is that: ‘If the US can do it, so can we. They’re a big country with security interests and so are we,’” said Siemon Wezeman, a senior fellow at the arms transfers program at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in Sweden.
“The justification for an attack would be that Beijing too has a responsibility for the safety of its citizens. There needs to be agreement on what the limits are,” he said.
Though China claims its military posture is entirely defensive, its navy and civilian maritime services have engaged in repeated standoffs with ships from other nations in the South China and East China seas. Meanwhile, India says Chinese troops set up camp almost 20km into Indian-claimed territory before agreeing to begin withdrawing on Sunday.
It is not yet known exactly what China’s latest drones are capable of because, like most Chinese equipment, they remain untested in battle. The military and associated aerospace firms have offered little information, although in an interview last month with the Xinhua news agency, Yang Baokui (楊寶奎), chief designer at plane maker COSIC, said Chinese drones were closing the gap, but still needed to progress in half a dozen major areas, from airframe design to digital linkups.
Executives at COSIC and drone makers ASN, Avic and the 611 Institute declined to be interviewed, citing their military links.
The Chinese Ministry of National Defense’s latest report on the status of its military, released in the middle of last month, made no mention of drones and ministry spokesman Yang Yujun (楊宇軍) made only the barest acknowledgment of their existence in response to a question.
“Drones are a new high-tech form of weaponry employed and used by many militaries around the world,” Yang said. “China’s armed forces are developing weaponry and equipment for the purpose of upholding territorial integrity, national security and world peace. It will pose no threat to any country.”
Drones are already patrolling China’s borders and a navy drone was deployed to the western province of Sichuan to provide aerial surveillance following last month’s deadly earthquake. They may also soon be appearing over China’s maritime claims, including the Japanese-controlled Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in the East China Sea, which China considers its own and are also claimed by Taiwan. That could sharpen tensions in an area where Chinese and Japanese patrol boats already confront each other on a regular basis and Japan frequently scrambles fighters to tail manned Chinese aircraft.
Retired Chinese major general Peng Guoqian (彭國強) told state media in January that drones were already being used to photograph and conduct surveillance over the Diaoyutais which are known as the Senkaku Islands in Japan.
The Pentagon says that Chinese drones could boost the effectiveness of long-range radar in monitoring activity and locating targets in the western Pacific far from the Chinese coast. Their missions could include guiding home an anti-ship ballistic missile known in military circles as a “carrier killer,” the Pentagon said in last year’s report on China’s military.
Reports about the search for notorious river bandit Naw Kham, wanted for the 2011 murders of 13 Chinese sailors, offer some clues about China’s plans for drones.
Liu Yuejin (劉躍進), the head of the Chinese Ministry of Public Security’s anti-narcotics bureau, was quoted by state media as saying a plan had been floated to target Naw Kham’s fortified camp with a drone loaded with 20kg of TNT. The type of drone was not mentioned. The plan was dropped by higher-ups in favor of taking Naw Kham alive, but the revelation served as a statement of Chinese intentions and capabilities.
China began developing drones in the 1960s and is believed to have used them for reconnaissance during its brief 1979 invasion of Vietnam. The program was aided by the adaptation of foreign civilian or dual-use UAVs for military purposes, then took a leap forward with the purchase of Harpy drones from Israel. Later, US opposition to Israeli upgrades on the Harpys spurred China to build its own version.
China’s gains are aided by the industry’s relatively low costs and short production schedule, and boosted by the assembly of the country’s homebuilt Beidou navigation satellite system and improved high-speed data links. China’s military is expected to field hundreds, if not thousands, of drones, although the overall size of the fleet is difficult to estimate and the US will ultimately have many more.
Chinese UAVs range from simple propeller-driven models to the high-concept, stealthy Dark Sword, featuring a joined wing and tail assembly similar to the US Avenger. More than 90 percent of the Chinese drones now in service are variants on the simpler ASN-209 surveillance drone seen in navy drills and which are now being produced under license by Egypt.
Others include the Wing Loong, or Pterodactyl, which bears a striking resemblance to the US Reaper and carries a brace of missiles. Chinese media reports and air show staff say it has been exported to countries in the Middle East and Central Asia, possibly the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Uzbekistan, at just a fraction of the Reaper’s price tag of US$30 million each. Military officials in the UAE and Uzbekistan declined to comment on the reports.
Another combat drone being offered for export, the CH-4, has space for four missiles and is said to be able to fly continuously for 30 hours. Even more ambitious is the Xiang Long BZK-005, similar to the US Global Hawk. It has a reported range of 6,437km and is roughly the size of a medium-sized fighter jet. However, deployment may be some time off and a 2011 crash points to rumored problems with the guidance system.
Further developments could see China competing with the world’s two major drone producers, the US and Israel, for markets in close ally Pakistan, Myanmar and other developing nations. Customers might even include Russia, which is the world’s No. 2 arms exporter, but has had little success making UAVs. There are some indications that China may already be exporting know-how to Pakistan, given design similarities between Chinese drones and Pakistan’s Shahpar UAV, said Huw Williams, an expert on drones at Jane’s Defence Weekly.
However, Williams said China will likely struggle to find customers for its larger drones, given limited demand and the large number of countries developing such systems of their own.
“They’re very interested in getting into this market,” Wezeman said. “Another few years and they will have caught up.”
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS