Taking pride in eco-diversity
In a recent Taipei Times article, artist Jane Ingram Allen made a noteworthy comment about how people living near the Chenglong Wetlands have changed their attitude toward the protection of the area: “When I first came here, [the villagers] saw the wetlands only as a bad thing … but now it is very popular … and people come to watch them. They are feeling more pride in their own place.” (“Art on the marsh,” May 4, page 12).
Only recently have conservationists around the world realized that a sense of pride may be an underused tool in preserving endangered species and ecosystems.
For a long time, conservationists focused on two other arguments to convince people to protect irreplaceable species and ecosystems: intrinsic and monetary values.
Intrinsic values emphasize that plants and animals enrich our lives by providing educational, intellectual and recreational opportunities, aesthetic and spiritual enjoyment and a sense of identity.
A healthy environment is thus fundamental to a good life. Conservation and sustainable biodiversity thus becomes an ethical issue of moral conduct toward other life forms and in relation to fellow human beings and cultures.
On the other hand, monetary values were summarized under the clunky term of “ecosystem services,” but despite that ecosystems provide more wealth for free than the entire human economy produces (“The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital,” Nature, Vol. 387, pages 253-260), not much progress has been made in convincing either local people or decisionmakers that conservation is a worthwhile exercise.
Enter pride. In many localities around the world, conservationists have been teaching people that their local wildlife species are unique and exist nowhere else — a fact which often came as a total surprise to people.
Awareness through education has led people to take pride in what had suddenly become something special.
Taiwanese conservationists are also increasingly using education and pride to rescue species from possible extinction. After the sad news that the clouded leopard is almost certainly extinct in Taiwan (“Formosan leopard extinct: zoologists,” May 1, page 4), the same team of conservationists are now focusing on saving a much smaller leopard cat from a similar fate.
Part of this effort is to make the leopard cat a mascot for Miaoli County. By adopting the leopard cat as a mascot, local knowledge and pride are improved, and eventually some money may be generated via eco-tourism.
Too much of Taiwan already looks like any other urban or rural development in the world: faceless concrete buildings and highways, global chains like McDonald’s and Starbucks, monotonous and lifeless plantations. It is high time that we take pride in what makes Taiwan unique — that which is irreplaceable.
Just like Longshan Temple and the Palace Museum protect the unique cultural heritage of Taiwan, protecting the white dolphin, blue magpie or leopard cat should not be seen as an impediment to ultimately self-destructive economic growth, but as a proud symbol of protecting what makes this nation unique and beautiful.
Flora Faun
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS