A couple of years ago, I wrote about the increasing tensions on the Korean Peninsula and mentioned that as a young soldier, I had fought in the Korean War.
I concluded that it was important for Taiwan to come down on the side of its friends and allies: South Korea, Japan and the US.
At present, the situation is heating up again, with North Korea threatening strikes against the South, Japan and the US. While the government in Beijing is professing deep concern about the situation, its own bellicose behavior is part of the reason why North Korea is acting in this way.
China’s recent belligerent and provocative behavior against the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia in the South China Sea, and against Japan in the East China Sea has given North Korea the impression that it is acceptable for it to throw its weight around and bully its neighbors.
While some in China are apparently willing to soften their support for North Korea, the leadership still seems to want to prop up its fellow communist regime, perhaps to act as a buffer between itself and South Korea and Japan.
Several US observers have said that they have detected “a shift” in China’s attitudes and that Beijing can be convinced to lean on Pyongyang to step back. I believe it would be naive to think that China would significantly change its position toward its old friends and communist allies in North Korea.
China may give the appearance of shifting back and forth a bit, but after that, much will remain the same.
The now well-known statement made on April 6 by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the Boao Forum for Asia that “no one should be allowed to throw a region and even the whole world into chaos for selfish gains,” falls into the smoke and mirrors category.
This can also be evidence in the developments surrounding a commentary published on Feb. 27 in the Financial Times, in which Deng Yuwen (鄧聿文), a deputy editor at the Chinese Communist Party newspaper the Study Times, called for China to abandon North Korea as an ally. Citing an array of strategic arguments, Deng urged Chinese leaders to press for the reunification of the Korean Peninsula rather than propping up the North. A few days after the commentary was printed, Deng was suspended indefinitely from his position.
So, where does Taiwan stand on all this? The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has stated that it is “monitoring” the situation, and has urged North Korea “to exert self-restraint and to seek dialogue to resolve the issues about which Pyongyang is concerned.”
The Presidential Office announced that it is “paying close attention to the situation on the Korean Peninsula,” and that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) “has instructed the National Security Council to be fully prepared for any outcome.”
Still, Taiwan could do more: It could say that it is in favor of a transition to democracy in North Korea. The present “status quo” — in both North Korea and Taiwan — are outdated relics of the Cold War. If there is to be real long-term stability in the region, then the people of these two countries need to be allowed to make their own decision on their future.
This would require China to allow the processes of self-determination to run their full course and not interfere or threaten interference if these processes go in a different direction than the one it wants. What is needed is a Chinese Mikhail Gorbachev who respects the rights of all of China’s neighbors to chart their own destiny, which would also be in Beijing’s best interest.
Nat Bellocchi served as chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan between 1990 and 1995. The views expressed in this article are his own.
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
US president-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News on Monday said he would “never say” if the US is committed to defending Taiwan against China. Trump said he would “prefer” that China does not attempt to invade Taiwan, and that he has a “very good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Before committing US troops to defending Taiwan he would “have to negotiate things,” he said. This is a departure from the stance of incumbent US President Joe Biden, who on several occasions expressed resolutely that he would commit US troops in the event of a conflict in
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
RSS