In chapter six of his 2009 book Nuclear Energy, author John Tabak wrote that the US chose Yucca Mountain in Nevada for the final disposal of high-level nuclear waste, saying that it is an area with a small population, very little rainfall — the yearly average only reaches 19mm — and the absence of major fault lines. This means that it is very unlikely that repeated earthquakes would lift up the repository toward the surface of the earth, which means that there is little risk that nuclear waste will leak into the biosphere or set off changes in the groundwater level. Despite all this, funding for the site was terminated by the US Congress in 2011.
Looking at the situation in Taiwan, on Monday, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), quoted Atomic Energy Council Minister Tsai Chuen-horng (蔡春鴻) as saying that the council is still planning for long-term disposal of high-level nuclear waste, and that the council has not chosen a site yet. Tsai also said that there are some earth strata in Taiwan that are suitable for final disposal of nuclear waste, such as near Sioulin Township (秀林) in Hualien County, but that further investigation is needed since the related research has been obstructed.
However, there is a lot of rainfall and frequent earthquakes in Taiwan, which makes it all but impossible to find appropriate sites for the final disposal of nuclear waste. Tsai’s remarks were truly shocking. Does he have any expert knowledge at all about nuclear waste disposal?
In terms of the nuclear power issue, one could easily say that “it is the permanent disposal of nuclear waste that is the problem with nuclear power generation, stupid.”
Taiwan Power Co chief of nuclear safety Chien Fu-tien (簡福添) has said the site for final disposal of Taiwan’s high-level nuclear waste could be either domestic or abroad, but “that waste is currently stored at the three nuclear power plants.”
The possibility of final disposal abroad revealed by Chien was yet another shocking piece of news. The ideal solution is to reprocess high-level nuclear waste into uranium 235 or plutonium 239 domestically and convert it into nuclear fuel. However, enriched U-235 and recycled P-239 could be used in nuclear weapons, and the international community is sensitive to the reprocessing of nuclear waste, in particular if there are concerns that it might be used in nuclear weapons, and so is opposed to such reprocessing.
China started to build nuclear power plants with a total of 10 electricity units of 1,000MW each in Ningde City and Fuqing City of Fujian Province, as well as in Yangjiang City in Guangdong Province in 2008.
These plants are expected to begin operations sometime between this year and 2015, and nuclear fuel will be processed through a closed recycling technique.
This means that Beijing will be able to recycle U-235 or P-239 from high-level nuclear waste, which could be used for nuclear weapons.
If Taiwan ships its high-level nuclear waste to China for final disposal, it might indirectly enhance Chinese nuclear weapons. This is a frightening scenario.
Chen Yi-nan is convener of the Northern Taiwan Society’s science and technology subcommittee.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS