‘Global weirding’ on the rise
Can a cold spell across Europe in March be evidence for global warming? Of course it can.
“Global warming” is actually a misnomer, as Pulitzer-winning author Thomas Friedman pointed out in his book Hot, Flat, and Crowded — it should really be called “global weirding.”
All climate change modelers have predicted that, while average global temperatures will increase, variation will also increase, which means that both hot and cold spells, as well as flood and drought frequency, will increase. Therefore, weird weather events like cold spells in March do not contradict, but support climate-change modeling.
A recent report in the world’s premier science journal Nature showed that climate models have been spot-on for the past 15 years. Confidence in model predictions is increasing with every refinement and there is little doubt that forecasts of dangerous temperature increases of two or more degrees Celsius by the middle of the century will come true if nothing changes in our energy production, agricultural practices and biodiversity protection.
This is well-known, but still people, including two whose letters have been published previously in the Taipei Times, continue to regurgitate denialist arguments about climate change which have been dismissed by literally hundreds of the world’s premier scientists.
Such scientific misinformation is becoming more dangerous for future generations.
Expecting a baby soon, it is becoming more incomprehensible to me that people would endanger our future generations in such irresponsible ways.
Taiwan is especially vulnerable to the effects of climate change. The nation’s government should take note of a report recently published by the US Geological Survey entitled Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerabilities. This report details the growing impact of climate change on coastal communities, especially low-lying areas, which will be impacted by sea-level rise, erosion, storms and floods.
Financial risks, such as the US$100 billion that Hurricane Sandy cost, will also increase.
Storm surge flooding and sea-level rise will pose significant threats to public and private infrastructure, which provide energy, sewage treatment, clean water and transportation of people and goods.
With the majority of Taiwan’s population and infrastructure located in low-lying coastal areas, it is almost criminal negligence that the nation’s government does not take climate change mitigation and adaptation more seriously.
Given the growing resistance to nuclear energy, a great expansion of renewable energy and higher energy efficiency are the only reasonable solutions, and could also spawn competitive export industries for the coming zero-carbon economy.
As the frequency of weird weather increases in the next decade, the nation will also have to invest billions of New Taiwan dollars in flood, drought and storm defenses, or suffer the consequences of being unprepared.
It really is time to wake up from the slumber and take “global weirding” seriously.
Flora Faun
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS