The UN Security Council unanimously approved new sanctions on North Korea after its third nuclear test last month.
While the international community punishes Pyongyang for its recalcitrant behavior, it does not take a rocket scientist to realize that the US and China have failed to thwart Pyongyang’s nuclear ambition. It is high time that the two powers did serious soul-searching about the messy situation in Northeast Asia.
Both powers oppose North Korea’s nuclear brinksmanship, but the US’ “sticks only” and China’s “lips and teeth” policies toward North Korea have failed. At the core is the difficulty for the US and China to establish a trust-based relationship to deal with common challenges.
Offering continuous support for a repressive government and sometimes tacitly condoning its reckless behavior are not commensurate with China’s aspiration to be a responsible great power.
To be friends with a rogue regime like North Korea deeply damages China’s international image. Nevertheless, North Korea is a traditional ally, with enduring, albeit declining, strategic value to China today.
China does not want to side with North Korea all the time, or support North Korea’s many repulsive policies, yet it cannot simply let North Korea fail and collapse given the complex security situation in East Asia.
With China acting like an indulgent parent, North Korea has been emboldened to challenge the international community repeatedly.
China mistakenly hopes that North Korea will open up under its leader Kim Jong-un.
The changes Kim has introduced have proven to be superficial and he seems determined to carry on the songun (military first) policy, brushing off China’s warnings and disregarding China’s interests.
The third nuclear test was a wake-up call. China must reconsider its security strategy and change its North Korea policy. Cutting aid to North Korea will be an initial step in the right direction.
However, with little trust between Beijing and Washington, China is unlikely to pressure North Korea too much. Failure to support North Korea, which will lead to its eventual collapse, could result in far worse consequences for China than many outside observers realize.
A unified, nuclear-capable, and pro-US Korea, with US and Korean troops potentially just across the Yalu River, is not a satisfactory scenario for China. Millions of North Korean refugees will pose tremendous economic, social, political and humanitarian challenges for it.
Such Chinese concerns must be alleviated before Beijing will commit to denuclearizing North Korea, but a nuclearized North Korea, though not what China favors, may be more acceptable than a collapsed North Korea.
The US’ Asia policy has been dubbed the “pivot to Asia” in the past couple of years. The US has beefed up relations with traditional allies in the region, such as Japan and South Korea, reached out to new friends such as Vietnam and Burma, and deployed additional troops in Australia.
Despite the US government’s repeated denial that its “strategic rebalancing” is aimed at encircling China, such suspicions run deep in Beijing.
The reason is simple: The “pivot to Asia” policy has a fatal flaw — while warming up relations with China’s neighbors, the US has not done much to strengthen relations with China. As a result, the “pivot to Asia” smacks of a new type of “encirclement” of China in the eyes of many Chinese and foreign observers, and has been damaging to US-China relations.
North Korea may well have taken advantage of the split between China and the US in its repeated provocations.
A new approach to North Korea must begin with the recognition that the US’ and China’s current security policies toward each other, and toward the “Hermit Kingdom,” have failed.
As US President Barack Obama’s new foreign policy team takes shape, the US must redefine the “pivot to Asia” strategy and improve relations with China.
Without a strong and cooperative relationship with China, the US’ Asia policy will not succeed. As the leadership transfer is complete in Beijing, China’s new foreign and security policy makers must take a fresh look at the North Korea conundrum and be more creative in finding a viable solution.
Sanctions alone seldom work in international politics. It may be too late to stop North Korea from becoming a nuclear state, but the US and China can, and should, work together to manage the North Korea challenge to promote lasting stability in East Asia and to prevent proliferation of nuclear weapons and technology.
Zhiqun Zhu is a professor of political science and international relations at Bucknell University in Pennsylvania.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS