On International Human Rights Day, Dec. 10 last year, the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee invited the Judicial Yuan and the Ministry of Justice to deliver reports on human rights and how to avoid miscarriages of justice.
The North America Taiwanese Professors’ Association (NATPA) affirms the request by the committee’s convener, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女), for these reports and to speak up on behalf of those who have been wronged.
We also thank DPP legislators Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋), Mark Chen (陳唐山) and Hsu Tain-tsair (許添財) for speaking up for former Sino Swearingen Aircraft Corp (SSAC) chairman and chief executive Kuo Ching-chiang (郭清江), a member of NATPA allegedly involved in embezzlement and corruption at SSAC.
The three legislators said that the Special Investigation Division (SID), after conducting the SSAC investigation in 2008, did not further investigate the case.
Usually investigations must be finalized within eight months, but this case has been ongoing for almost five years without finding any wrongdoing by Kuo. The SID will not close the investigation and Minister of Justice Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫) and Prosecutor-General Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) will not deal with it. This has caused suspicion that it is being handled on a political basis.
Kuo is not a public official, but he is under investigation for malfeasance. He was also barred from leaving the country for 10 months without legal grounds.His human rights have been seriously violated.
While barred from leaving the country, he requested that the SID initiate court proceedings to clarify the situation, but his request was rejected.
When Kuo was interviewed by the SID for the second time in January 2009, prosecutors told him that the US’ investigation into the SSAC case had been completed, that no irregularities had been found and that the investigation would not continue, so he was no longer barred from leaving the country.
However, he was informed that the SID was investigating former Council for Economic Planning and Development chairperson Ho Mei-yueh (何美玥) for influence peddling, and that he was suspected of “passively assisting Ho” and might have to return to Taiwan for questioning. He had to post NT$1 million (US$34,000) bail.
Kuo has still not been summoned for questioning. He has requested that the case be closed on five occasions, but the SID has ignored him and his bail payment has not been returned.
Kuo gave up a well-paid job in the US to return to Taiwan and has made numerous contributions here. For example, he helped resolve several problems in Taipei’s Mass Rapid Transit system.
He assisted in reconstruction following the 921 Earthquake in 1999 and developed ecological engineering techniques to prevent landslides and restore residential security.
Furthermore, he took charge of SSAC, where he obtained every certification required by the US’ Federal Aviation Administration, set up a production line to manufacture high-quality commercial aircraft and attract investment from a Saudi Arabian company, raising SSAC’s value to over US$100 million.
Despite these achievements, the abuse of judicial power and slander by the media have destroyed his reputation. He has been in limbo, suffering due to deliberate procrastination of prosecutors and an unwillingness to close the investigation although they are unable to find any evidence of wrongdoing.
NATPA calls on the Ministry of Justice to urge the prosecutor-general to urgently address this case and, if no wrongdoing can be established, promptly close the investigation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily