Call to reform HIV policy
It’s about to become 2013 and Taiwan still deports foreigners who are HIV-positive as stipulated by Article 18 of the HIV Infection Control and Patients Rights Protection Act (人類免疫缺乏病毒傳染防治及感染者權益保障條例). According to the Joint UN Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS), only 20 countries, territories and areas continue to do so.
The Taiwanese government, usually eager to promote itself as a human rights-focused democracy, now lags another year behind China, which lifted travel bans on foreigners with HIV in 2010. The irony is biting.
Scientific studies have confirmed and reconfirmed how deportation of foreigners with HIV does not protect public health, as many UNAIDS reports show. Professor Chen Yi-ming (陳宜民) of the National Yang-Ming University has been quoted as saying: “How can deportation help drive down the infection rate? The link between these two is tenuous” (“HIV deportations reconsidered,” Nov. 9, 2004, page 2).
At best, this reveals the Taiwanese government’s lingering xenophobia and homophobia.
At worst, it breaks families apart and uproots the lives of otherwise productive residents.
Article 20 of the act outlines exceptions to the deportation policy for those “infected by their native spouses or infected through the process of receiving medical care in the country” and those who “have relatives within the second degree of kinship who have household registration in Taiwan.”
In other words, you can’t stay in Taiwan if you don’t have immediate family in the country, or if you can’t prove that your Taiwanese spouse infected you with the disease.
Moreover, given that same-sex marriage is not legal in Taiwan, a gay man cannot stay in the country with his partner, even if he can prove that his Taiwanese partner infected him.
If the government does not reform this archaic and discriminatory deportation policy next year, I fear that the HIV infection rates in Taiwan will continue to climb because the government is too stubborn to refocus its priorities away from surface-level solutions to address the heart of the issue: misinformation about HIV.
Only two months ago, in September, the Ministry of Education effectively forced an elementary-school teacher to take an HIV test to prove false an anonymous accusation. If government officials are so misinformed that they believe that an elementary-school teacher can infect his students just by sharing a classroom, or that deporting foreigners with HIV will reduce the infection rate in Taiwan, then how can we expect the people they govern to know the details of how to prevent the spread of the virus?
To effectively stop HIV, the government needs to implement policies that encourage residents to get tested and receive treatment, not ones that make them feel so afraid of the stigma or deportation that they avoid testing and seeking treatment.
Though I hope that next year will be the year that Taiwan catches up to China and the rest of the developed world by reforming its regulations on deporting foreigners with HIV, I am not optimistic. I tried to speak with the Centers for Disease Control about this issue and they declined to comment.
Allister Chang
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS