News of the Dec. 14 shooting that took the lives of 26 students and teachers at a Connecticut elementary school has shocked people all around the world, and it has sparked renewed debate over gun control in the US.
Statistics suggest that there are about 270 million guns owned by people in the US, not including those belonging to the armed forces and police. Considering that the US population is something over 310 million, that means that there is nearly one firearm for every person in the country — the highest rate of gun ownership among 179 countries for which such figures have been compiled.
Americans’ liking for owning guns has a long history and a complex social and cultural background, and in modern times it is as crucial an economic and political issue as ever.
For early European settlers, gun ownership had to do with their distrust of the government, and particularly the British colonial government of the time, which was one of the main reasons and motives for American independence.
Following independence, settlers gradually spread westward from the East Coast, occupying indigenous peoples’ lands as they went. The settlers generally had no effective protection from the government, so they needed to have their own firearms to protect themselves.
This historical background explains how the Second Amendment to the US Constitution, which protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, came to be adopted in 1791. The inclusion of this right in the Constitution has made it very hard to pass any law that seeks to restrict the right to own guns.
Nowadays, the greatest obstacle to gun control comes from the National Rifle Association (NRA), the main organization that supports gun ownership in the US. According to a recent report in the New York Times, the NRA has millions of members around the country and a budget of US$300 million, helping it to get its way in Congress and obstruct gun control legislation. For example, the association has spent several tens of millions of US dollars on political advertisements this year alone.
The most common argument presented by advocates of gun ownership is that, “Guns don’t kill people; people kill people.” Although this slogan appears to make some sense, it really only serves to blur the focus, because even though guns cannot kill people on their own, they enable people to kill people more effectively. The massacre in Connecticut clearly proves the point.
The US today is a country of mass gun ownership, and this in turn makes even more people think that they need guns to protect themselves, forming a vicious circle.
While the recent shooting has prompted renewed calls for legislation restricting gun ownership, its immediate effect has been to generate a sudden surge in business for gun shops. This effect is a fine illustration of how this vicious circle works.
It is clear that gun control legislation will continue to run up against many difficulties, and Americans will go on being torn between the desire to own a firearm on the one hand and fear of getting shot on the other.
Chi Chun-chieh is a professor in the Department of Ethnic Relations and Cultures at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
RSS