On Sept. 11, Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) announced an economic stimulus package focusing on five areas: encouraging innovation, increasing exports, training more skilled workers, attracting investment and improving government efficiency. However, what Chen presented was merely a wrap-up of the conclusion the Cabinet came to during its past five meetings on financial issues and lacked any in-depth analysis of the reasons for the nation’s structural imbalances, especially the negative effects that the shortcomings of the legislature and government administration are having on the economy.
As a result, Chen was criticized by the public, with some calling him a “liar” and likening his policy to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “6-3-3” promise when he was campaigning for president in 2008 of achieving 6 percent annual GDP growth, a per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of below 3 percent — all of which never happened.
On Sept. 5, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics announced that the consumer price index last month was 110.74, rising 3.42 percent from the previous year and the highest figure since the global financial crisis started. In addition, an Asian Intelligence Reports Index political and economic risk report also showed that Taiwan’s GDP contracted by 0.18 percent in the second quarter of this year. This not only ranked Taiwan last among the four Asian Tigers, it also placed Taiwan at the bottom of the list of 12 major Asian nations and areas. Taiwan was also the only economy to record a contraction — its worst performance in several years. Taiwan’s unemployment rate of 4.31 percent in July was also much higher than those of the other Asian Tigers.
On Sept. 7, the Ministry of Finance announced that exports last month dropped 4.2 percent from a year ago to US$24.69 billion. It was the sixth consecutive monthly drop in outbound shipments and shows that the nation has gradually been losing its economic momentum for some time now. This is unfortunately not just something that can be blamed on a weak international economy. It is rather something that needs further examination to see how improper government administration is responsible.
The primary symptom of improper government administration is corruption. Lately, there has been a string of corruption cases involving senior officials from the Water Resources Agency, the National Fire Agency and the Criminal Investigation Bureau, as well as the bribery scandal surrounding former Cabinet secretary-general Lin Yih-shih (林益世). There have also been news of several heads of general hospitals taking kickbacks, as well as elementary-school principals being involved in corrupt practices over student lunches. All of these incidents show that the government is not nearly as clean as it was when Taiwan’s economy first began taking off years ago.
Another problem is that a lot of administrative work in government agencies is either outsourced or given to temporary staff or in lieu of military service, and bureaucracy has worsened. Senior or qualified staff spend their days pushing paper to little effect, and sometimes cannot even do this properly. For example, earlier this month in Greater Taichung, there was a case of glaring incompetence in which a document to be submitted to the Ministry of the Interior was stamped by seven different officials before it was finally discovered that the recipient’s name on the paper was that of the former interior minister, not that of the incumbent. All these officials do now is tell the contract or temporary workers what to do, whereas in the past they would have been more directly involved and would have gained practical experience and skills on the job. This trend has been accompanied by a decline in efficiency and morale within government organizations.
Another sign of improper administration is a lack of power when it comes to following through on and enforcing administrative decisions. Government agencies spend too much time, effort and money on making themselves look good, but do not pay enough attention to or do enough when its comes to the issues such as sanitation, safety and order. Such oversight has resulted in harmful foodstuffs, clothing and cosmetics flooding the markets, illegal structures being built and serious issues, such as reduce traffic violations, improve forest and river conservation, protect resources, and deal with environmental, scenic and air pollution, being reduced to mere slogans during elections. Together, these factors have increasingly affected the public’s quality of life.
The public is also fed up with the 18 percent preferential interest rates on pensions for retired civil servants, the 13 percent interest subsidy on pensions for retired staff of state-owned enterprises, and the education subsidy for offspring of civil servants — all of which have no legal basis. Moreover, retired civil servants enjoy holiday benefits equivalent to one-and-a-half months of their previous salary and a 30-year cap on payments for the National Health Insurance premiums. These are all examples of where the social welfare system has gone wrong.
Even worse is that most civil servants retire around the age of 55 and some make use of loopholes in the system to get a lucrative post in private schools or subsidiaries of their former companies. In such places, they often make more than double their original salary, working as a school or company director or some other high-ranking position. And of course, they also receive further retirement benefits from these private firms.
Improper government administration has driven more people into poverty and unemployment and contributed to an increasingly sluggish economy.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs