Time to do the right thing
As an independent observer of Taiwanese politics, I am concerned over the health of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) after reading recent reports that indicated that he had developed post-traumatic stress disorder and depression.
Rather than instructing the Ministry of Justice to carefully monitor Chen’s health (“Monitor Chen Shui-bian’s health: Ma,” Aug. 1, page 3), President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) should release his predecessor on medical parole if the ministry’s check-up revealed findings similar to those of the former president’s medical team.
Regardless of how one gauges Chen’s performance during his eight-year term, Ma and his administration must acknowledge that the former president is first and foremost a citizen of the Republic of China who should be entitled to equal and fair access to medical treatment at all times during his prison term.
If Chen’s health has indeed deteriorated over the past four years and he faces the possibility of dying within the next four years, the humane thing to do would be to release Chen on parole so that he can seek adequate and comfortable treatment.
Regardless of one’s political affiliation, there is no denying that Chen has done a lot of good for Taiwan. For instance, when he was mayor of Taipei, which is now considered an Asian holiday destination, Chen cracked down on vice activities like illegal gambling and prostitution.
During his eight-year presidential term, Chen enhanced the identity and branding of Taiwan. Chen’s administration also renamed several state-owned or private enterprises to bear the name “Taiwan.” Because of Chen, “Taiwan” is now printed on the passports of millions of Taiwanese.
I am in no position to judge the legacy of Chen, but like many other concerned Taiwanese and foreign observers, I humbly request that Ma consider placing Chen on medical parole. Chen is one who loves Taiwan and has done a lot for the country.
I believe many observers will agree that Taiwan has become more polarized since Ma assumed the presidency in May 2008. Ma’s performance to date has yet to convince many Taiwanese that he would be the man to chart their future and destiny. Even the pro-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) cable news channel TVBS recently reported that Ma’s approval rating had plunged to its lowest level ever — just 15 percent.
As president, Ma should be magnanimous toward his former rivals and a decision to release Chen on medical parole is the first step he should take in reuniting the divided nation. As many will agree, Chen’s release would be based purely on humanitarian grounds and has nothing to do with political or judicial reasons.
The ball is now in Ma’s court. His decision will either help him regain trust and confidence, which many Taiwanese used to have in him, or it could alienate him even further from ordinary Taiwanese people.
For the sake of both Taiwan and Chen, I hope Ma does the right, and sensible, thing.
Jason Lee
Singapore
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS