Time to do the right thing
As an independent observer of Taiwanese politics, I am concerned over the health of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) after reading recent reports that indicated that he had developed post-traumatic stress disorder and depression.
Rather than instructing the Ministry of Justice to carefully monitor Chen’s health (“Monitor Chen Shui-bian’s health: Ma,” Aug. 1, page 3), President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) should release his predecessor on medical parole if the ministry’s check-up revealed findings similar to those of the former president’s medical team.
Regardless of how one gauges Chen’s performance during his eight-year term, Ma and his administration must acknowledge that the former president is first and foremost a citizen of the Republic of China who should be entitled to equal and fair access to medical treatment at all times during his prison term.
If Chen’s health has indeed deteriorated over the past four years and he faces the possibility of dying within the next four years, the humane thing to do would be to release Chen on parole so that he can seek adequate and comfortable treatment.
Regardless of one’s political affiliation, there is no denying that Chen has done a lot of good for Taiwan. For instance, when he was mayor of Taipei, which is now considered an Asian holiday destination, Chen cracked down on vice activities like illegal gambling and prostitution.
During his eight-year presidential term, Chen enhanced the identity and branding of Taiwan. Chen’s administration also renamed several state-owned or private enterprises to bear the name “Taiwan.” Because of Chen, “Taiwan” is now printed on the passports of millions of Taiwanese.
I am in no position to judge the legacy of Chen, but like many other concerned Taiwanese and foreign observers, I humbly request that Ma consider placing Chen on medical parole. Chen is one who loves Taiwan and has done a lot for the country.
I believe many observers will agree that Taiwan has become more polarized since Ma assumed the presidency in May 2008. Ma’s performance to date has yet to convince many Taiwanese that he would be the man to chart their future and destiny. Even the pro-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) cable news channel TVBS recently reported that Ma’s approval rating had plunged to its lowest level ever — just 15 percent.
As president, Ma should be magnanimous toward his former rivals and a decision to release Chen on medical parole is the first step he should take in reuniting the divided nation. As many will agree, Chen’s release would be based purely on humanitarian grounds and has nothing to do with political or judicial reasons.
The ball is now in Ma’s court. His decision will either help him regain trust and confidence, which many Taiwanese used to have in him, or it could alienate him even further from ordinary Taiwanese people.
For the sake of both Taiwan and Chen, I hope Ma does the right, and sensible, thing.
Jason Lee
Singapore
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS