The approach of Tropical Storm Talim last week had a political effect, which was that a provisional session of the legislature could not be held and was instead postponed until July 20. An interesting question to ask is who lost out from Talim, and who gained from it?
Some people say that Talim helped President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) out of a tight spot. Their reasoning is that if the provisional session had gone ahead at a time when lawmakers belonging to Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were unwilling to fight for him, then the only motion tabled for the session — a proposed amendment to the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) that would primarily affect imports of US beef — would not have passed. If that had happened, Ma’s authority would have once again been badly dented. Now that the meeting can no longer be held, Ma can avoid further humiliation and so, according to this theory, the storm helped him out in a big way.
However, from another point of view, this is not the case. When the extended legislative session came to an end, the US beef issue was still unresolved, so Ma promptly convened a meeting of Cabinet, legislative and party officials and ordered them to immediately hold a provisional legislative session to ensure that the beef additive amendment would be passed. Evidently, Ma was hopping mad. With the provisional session now postponed, Ma’s plan cannot go forward and his calculations have all been messed up.
More importantly, the UN’s Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body set up to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair international food trade practices, will meet in Rome from Monday to Saturday next week. Information currently in the hands of government departments suggests that the commission may make a judgement unfavorable to the leanness-enhancing agent ractopamine. If so, then it can be foreseen that by the time the extra legislative session is held on July 20, KMT legislators will be even less willing to endorse Ma’s position on the relaxation of imports of US beef containing the controversial livestock feed additive.
As the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), it is of course the winner in this situation. The DPP was against holding a provisional session to start with, so its lawmakers are sure to be pleased now that the heavens have lent them a helping hand. In addition, the Codex Alimentarius Commission looks set to give a further boost to those who oppose amending the law. When that happens, even if the KMT and its supporters in the media resort to their old tricks of distortion and vilification, it will not do them any good.
Contrary to weather forecasters’ expectations, Tropical Storm Talim did not do much damage to Taiwan, so it turned out to be something of a tempest in a teacup. Talim created only one disaster area — the area around Ma himself.
As to the issue of ractopamine, is it not also a tempest in a teacup? All the Cabinet needed to do was issue an executive order amending the Standards for Veterinary Drug Residue Limits in Foods (動物用藥殘留標準) and it would have been assured of resolving the problem. Why go to all the trouble of fighting it out in the legislature?
Ma is the one who was determined to do it this way. In his view, his party’s majority in the legislature was so secure it could even force through the Local Government Act (地方制度法) two years ago, so why should the US beef issue be a problem? As KMT Chairman, Ma thought that his party’s legislators would all take the rap for him, just as his former secretary Yu Wen (余文) did over Ma’s special allowance fund when he was Taipei mayor.
Ma, ever incompetent, obviously never thought that KMT legislators would group together and rebel against him, but in the event, they left him to stew in his own juice by telling him that he could repay his debt to the US by issuing an executive order. Contrary to Ma’s expectations, his legislators could not be relied upon to do his bidding this time. So, when the provisional session is held on July 20, it will be as hard to get the amendment passed as it was last time, if not harder.
The Ma administration chose not to use an executive order to begin with, but now that it has run into a snag in the legislature, it may be compelled to do precisely that. The legality of doing this is doubtful, not to mention its fairness.
In sending its draft amendments on beef regulations to the legislature for deliberation, the Cabinet acted in accordance with the Constitution, which stipulates that the Cabinet should be accountable to the legislature and respect the legislature’s right to participate in deciding policy with regard to important national affairs.
Now, with the food sanitation law waiting to be amended in the legislature, the Cabinet wants to circumvent the political body by acting on its own. Apart from the disregard it shows for the legislature, the Cabinet’s approach could well be unconstitutional.
Who would have thought that Ma would get himself into such a stew over something as trivial as US beef? It just goes to show that in the world of politics you can never be sure what is cooking.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
The rise of drones — tactical, maritime and integrated drone missiles — and their application on the battlefield is fundamentally changing the character of warfare. Taiwan must be at the forefront of these shifts to leverage their potential, especially in boosting deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Drones are revolutionizing modern warfare, introducing new tactical and strategic dimensions, and providing smaller, less equipped forces with the ability to challenge and overcome larger powers, as seen with Ukraine’s resistance against Russia’s invasion and the ousting of former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad by rebels led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). In an interview
RSS