The approach of Tropical Storm Talim last week had a political effect, which was that a provisional session of the legislature could not be held and was instead postponed until July 20. An interesting question to ask is who lost out from Talim, and who gained from it?
Some people say that Talim helped President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) out of a tight spot. Their reasoning is that if the provisional session had gone ahead at a time when lawmakers belonging to Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were unwilling to fight for him, then the only motion tabled for the session — a proposed amendment to the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) that would primarily affect imports of US beef — would not have passed. If that had happened, Ma’s authority would have once again been badly dented. Now that the meeting can no longer be held, Ma can avoid further humiliation and so, according to this theory, the storm helped him out in a big way.
However, from another point of view, this is not the case. When the extended legislative session came to an end, the US beef issue was still unresolved, so Ma promptly convened a meeting of Cabinet, legislative and party officials and ordered them to immediately hold a provisional legislative session to ensure that the beef additive amendment would be passed. Evidently, Ma was hopping mad. With the provisional session now postponed, Ma’s plan cannot go forward and his calculations have all been messed up.
More importantly, the UN’s Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body set up to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair international food trade practices, will meet in Rome from Monday to Saturday next week. Information currently in the hands of government departments suggests that the commission may make a judgement unfavorable to the leanness-enhancing agent ractopamine. If so, then it can be foreseen that by the time the extra legislative session is held on July 20, KMT legislators will be even less willing to endorse Ma’s position on the relaxation of imports of US beef containing the controversial livestock feed additive.
As the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), it is of course the winner in this situation. The DPP was against holding a provisional session to start with, so its lawmakers are sure to be pleased now that the heavens have lent them a helping hand. In addition, the Codex Alimentarius Commission looks set to give a further boost to those who oppose amending the law. When that happens, even if the KMT and its supporters in the media resort to their old tricks of distortion and vilification, it will not do them any good.
Contrary to weather forecasters’ expectations, Tropical Storm Talim did not do much damage to Taiwan, so it turned out to be something of a tempest in a teacup. Talim created only one disaster area — the area around Ma himself.
As to the issue of ractopamine, is it not also a tempest in a teacup? All the Cabinet needed to do was issue an executive order amending the Standards for Veterinary Drug Residue Limits in Foods (動物用藥殘留標準) and it would have been assured of resolving the problem. Why go to all the trouble of fighting it out in the legislature?
Ma is the one who was determined to do it this way. In his view, his party’s majority in the legislature was so secure it could even force through the Local Government Act (地方制度法) two years ago, so why should the US beef issue be a problem? As KMT Chairman, Ma thought that his party’s legislators would all take the rap for him, just as his former secretary Yu Wen (余文) did over Ma’s special allowance fund when he was Taipei mayor.
Ma, ever incompetent, obviously never thought that KMT legislators would group together and rebel against him, but in the event, they left him to stew in his own juice by telling him that he could repay his debt to the US by issuing an executive order. Contrary to Ma’s expectations, his legislators could not be relied upon to do his bidding this time. So, when the provisional session is held on July 20, it will be as hard to get the amendment passed as it was last time, if not harder.
The Ma administration chose not to use an executive order to begin with, but now that it has run into a snag in the legislature, it may be compelled to do precisely that. The legality of doing this is doubtful, not to mention its fairness.
In sending its draft amendments on beef regulations to the legislature for deliberation, the Cabinet acted in accordance with the Constitution, which stipulates that the Cabinet should be accountable to the legislature and respect the legislature’s right to participate in deciding policy with regard to important national affairs.
Now, with the food sanitation law waiting to be amended in the legislature, the Cabinet wants to circumvent the political body by acting on its own. Apart from the disregard it shows for the legislature, the Cabinet’s approach could well be unconstitutional.
Who would have thought that Ma would get himself into such a stew over something as trivial as US beef? It just goes to show that in the world of politics you can never be sure what is cooking.
Chin Heng-wei is a political commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Delegation-level visits between the two countries have become an integral part of transformed relations between India and the US. Therefore, the visit by a bipartisan group of seven US lawmakers, led by US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul to India from June 16 to Thursday last week would have largely gone unnoticed in India and abroad. However, the US delegation’s four-day visit to India assumed huge importance this time, because of the meeting between the US lawmakers and the Dalai Lama. This in turn brings us to the focal question: How and to what extent