The US sports media came up with a new word, “Linsanity,” to describe the unexpected — and inexplicable — string of astonishing performances by NBA player Jeremy Lin (林書豪).
On June 18, Atomic Energy Council (AEC) Minister Tsai Chuen-horng (蔡春鴻) and the council’s Department of Nuclear Regulation director Chen Yi-pin (陳宜彬) decided that Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) should restart reactor No. 1 of the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s (新北市) Wanli District (萬里). If one were to choose a word that best described this decision, one could not go far wrong with “insanity” here, either. What they are doing is essentially setting up the conditions for a compounded natural disaster and human catastrophe.
Taiwan was recently hit by torrential rain, with Tropical Storm Talin threatening to hit about 48 hours after the rain abated. It takes roughly 48 hours for a nuclear power plant to set up a parallel connection and to start producing power after initialization. According to safe operating procedure at nuclear power plants, the generators have to be slowed down or even stopped altogether in the event of a tropical storm or typhoon, which presents no problems in itself as offices and schools are shut and so the demand for power is significantly reduced on typhoon days. However, nuclear power generators are huge and if anything goes wrong it is difficult to deal with the problem, with catastrophic results for both the electricity grid and the power plant itself.
According to a number of very experienced Taipower employees, this is the first time in more than 30 years that the council has dictated to Taipower when to activate a nuclear reactor. In the past it has merely given the go-ahead, leaving the decision as to when to switch back on to Taipower. Interestingly, on the evening of June 18 the council put out a press release announcing the reactivation of the reactor, listing the contact person as Chen himself, together with his contact details. This has been interpreted by environmental groups as a blatant provocation to those opposed to nuclear power, or at least by way of discouraging them to call in or text message.
Even though summer is upon us, a time when more demands are made of the power grid, plants were only producing 60 percent of their total capacity during peak hours because the public is seeking to save energy in the face of the recent electricity price hikes. Coupled with that, there was a tropical storm threatening to hit. According to Taipower employees, the decision to reactivate the generator was a bad one, one that Taipower would not have made itself, demonstrating that council officials were taking a risk simply because they wanted to have the extra nuclear power merely for the sake of producing it.
In mid-March there were reports that broken anchor bolts were found at the reactor in question. No one had more cause for concern than workers in the plant. A broken bolt was found in reactor No. 2 last year, too, in what was termed at the time “an isolated case,” and the reactor was turned on without replacing the bolt.
Now we hear that seven more broken bolts have been discovered in the first reactor and officials in Taipower and the council are sure to want to call this an isolated case as well. Tsai even said there would be no safety concerns even if every single anchor bolt developed 2.5mm cracks, and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators believed him.
On June 5, I sent out post office evidentiary letters (存證信函) to 27 legislators in constituencies in Taipei, New Taipei City, Keelung, Taoyuan County and Yilan County, officially informing them that the Guosheng nuclear power plant has 10 major safety concerns that should be looked into before the plant is restarted.
Legally speaking, if an accident occurs at the plant in future that is related to the safety concerns surrounding these faulty bolts, then these legislators can be held politically accountable, as they would have failed to fulfill their duty as legislators to oversee the actions of the executive branch.
In the US beef imports standoff in the legislature, these particular lawmakers showed themselves to be rather indifferent to these responsibilities.
Over the course of this whole process, we have borne witness to the excessive willful blindness and egotistical manner of the council and Taipower and the mentality of “oh, it’ll be alright” as they disregard the most fundamental safety measures. They think it is about changing seven bolts, when actually it is about nuclear safety guarantees.
Some people say that the council officials are guilty of professional arrogance, but one might also say they are simply arrogance personified, constantly reminding us that we do not know what we are talking about, that we do not understand the issues, when in fact they themselves cannot even comply with a single one of the 18 clauses of the nuclear power quality assurance stipulations. It is like having a racing driver with absolutely no regard for the rules of the track: Just because they are professionals does not mean they can drive as they please.
A nuclear engineer friend of mine said to me: “We cannot say God didn’t give us a chance. We have taken the warnings we have been given as so much wind blowing past our ears. Should there be a nuclear accident, there is no way we can blame God. We will only have ourselves to blame.”
Jay Fang is the chairman of the Green Consumers’ Foundation.
Translated by Paul Cooper
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Delegation-level visits between the two countries have become an integral part of transformed relations between India and the US. Therefore, the visit by a bipartisan group of seven US lawmakers, led by US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul to India from June 16 to Thursday last week would have largely gone unnoticed in India and abroad. However, the US delegation’s four-day visit to India assumed huge importance this time, because of the meeting between the US lawmakers and the Dalai Lama. This in turn brings us to the focal question: How and to what extent