In President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) inauguration address he talked about “enhancing the drivers of economic growth,” emphasizing that it was important to “speedily complete follow-up talks under the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement [ECFA].” Ma also said he would “expedite negotiations on economic cooperation agreements with important trading partners like Singapore and New Zealand.” However, these two policies expose the contradictions inherent in the Ma administration’s overseas trade strategy.
Because of the age-old political sovereignty dispute, China continues to obstruct Taiwan’s attempts to sign free-trade agreements (FTAs) with other countries in an effort to isolate the nation economically.
In addition, follow-up ECFA talks on a bilateral investment agreement aimed at guaranteeing investments have been delayed by disagreements over dispute resolution mechanisms, jurisdiction and place of arbitration, all of which involve sovereignty.
Meanwhile, China has negotiated and signed duty-free FTAs with the ASEAN, Japan, South Korea and other countries, which has turned the ECFA into an empty framework, leaving no room to offer Taiwan further benefits from the agreement.
Take, for example, data running from January to last month. These show that exports from Taiwan to China dropped by 6.1 percent, while South Korean exports increased by 4.3 percent during the same period. For Taiwan, the ECFA is nothing but an agreement to become a economic colony of China.
Even more concerning, the government has misjudged the changes in China’s economic situation. If Taiwan continues to invest in China, it will be tantamount to putting all the our eggs in one basket, and a broken basket at that.
China, which joined the WTO more than a decade ago, is still reluctant to use research, development and innovation to upgrade its industry. Instead it is dumping duplicated cheap goods in both the European and US markets. This month, the US Department of Commerce decided to impose high anti-dumping tariffs of between 31.22 and 250 percent on companies importing solar power batteries from China, and that was just one of many punitive measures.
In addition to US sanctions on Chinese exports, Europe’s purchasing power has fallen as a result of its debt crisis. Unable to rely on the European and US markets, Beijing is now trying to switch from an export-oriented economy to an economy oriented toward domestic demand.
However, China’s domestic market also faces three major issues. First, increasing wages means that it is becoming less competitive as a factory to the world. Second, its wealth gap is too wide and its middle class is still not large enough to support the domestic market. Third, local government suffers from severe corruption problem at every level.
According to a March report released by the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, commencing this year, some foreign companies in China are adopting a “China plus one” strategy when establishing factories. This means that, in addition to their factories in China, they are establishing other plants in Southeast Asian countries. If everything goes well in the alternate nations, they may even relocate their factories from China wholesale. This development has been well received by the ASEAN countries.
The world’s factory is relocating and the Ma administration needs to pay close attention to the situation as it unfolds, that includes not misjudging the economic situation in China.
Hung Chi-kune is a member of the Democratic Progressive Party’s Central Executive Committee.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS