Pot calling the kettle black
As a newspaper that loves to criticize, I trust you will have the openness of mind to print a letter that criticizes you.
Many newspapers in the world support a political party, but your reporting is so openly biased toward the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that it is too much even for some DPP-leaning people to stomach. I’ve never seen any positive reporting from you about anything the current administration has done. You sound like an angry, bitter child who lost a game.
Lately, you have reserved your negativity for the decision by the government to raise gasoline prices. If readers had only your paper to rely on, they would fault the current administration for having to pay more at the pumps. The truth, that you fail to report, is that international oil prices are going up. Everybody in the world has to pay more. Do we live in a fairyland where we are exempt from facing reality?
During the previous administration, when the price of crude oil shot up, the government didn’t allow CPC Corp, Taiwan (CPC), to raise prices. That was a blatant attempt to win votes, as it was just before an election. It put CPC so deep in debt that it took them years to recover. You were quiet at that time and did not alert the public to the real situation. Had the previous administration increased the price, I have no doubt you would have supported it and explained in detail how international oil prices control the price of gasoline in Taiwan.
In your editorial of April 17, you chose a valid topic to comment about. More people should ride bicycles, not only for recreation, but also to work. Unfortunately, you couldn’t help yourself and had to blame somebody for that not happening. So you went after the Taipei City Government. It’s all their fault.
Don’t you realize that Taiwan will never be Holland or Denmark? People here will never ride their bicycles to work en masse. Should the city government spend money on things like bike lanes and other bicycle-friendly facilities that few, if any, would use, you would be too happy to criticize such spending as a waste of money.
And isn’t it interesting that during the DPP administration, when their policies were ruining Taiwan economically and the president and his wife were stealing millions of dollars from the public, you were right there supporting them?
Cilliers Landman
Shilin, Taipei
(Editor’s note: It is the responsibility of the media to monitor the government and its policy implementation, and to highlight the public interest. Currently, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] is in charge of administration at both the central government level and in Taipei City. It is therefore our responsibility as a newspaper to offer constructive criticism of the KMT as the sitting government.)
Homemade economic crisis
Working in the restaurant business, I am experiencing firsthand the impact of the government’s recent decision to increase gas prices and electricity rates.
It is always the same issue around this time of year, but nobody can resolve the problem. Prices increase in April and people watch their pockets more closely. This leads to lack of consumption, which in a worst-case scenario could result in staff layoffs, then the workers have no money to spend — a recipe for a downward spiral.
Does no one remember what happens every April to the public’s disposable income? It’s as if this news appeared without a moment’s notice, when it is already stressful for everyone.
The price hike announcements this month have brought trouble to many workers and companies, and I wonder why the government has waited until now to address the issue. It should have been addressed before the January presidential and legislative elections, not afterwards.
There should be solutions, but where are they? Now it is too late, the downward spiral has begun.
If anyone wants to give a figure, the truth is that the service sector will decline 50 percent. Is this not an alarming number? So must we wait for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) second inauguration on May 20 and the protests before it, or can we do something about it right now?
Andreas Forster
Sanjhih, New Taipei City
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
RSS