Not long ago, Singaporean Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said in a public speech that Singapore risked becoming a “Taiwan story” and would lose its global competitive edge if it closed its doors to talented individuals from overseas. He said this would lead to a fall in average salaries and a brain drain, because local professionals would move to China, the US and other countries.
Singapore, itself predominantly an ethnic Chinese state, has always regarded Taiwan as a province of China. Ideologically, its views are very similar to the views of Taiwan’s pro-unification academic and media circles, and as such it despises and is hostile to any measures that highlight Taiwan’s political and economic sovereignty, describing all such measures as “isolationist.”
It is true that the nation has been experiencing a brain drain in recent years. However, the reason is not that it restricts talented foreign individuals from coming to Taiwan. If that was true, Acer would not have been able to hire former chief executive Gianfranco Lanci. The reason for the brain drain is that China is a great magnet for talent.
China has attracted Taiwanese investments by offering attractive policies. Since investments are productive in nature, technical talent has followed in their wake.
However, if Taiwanese business did not go west, strong domestic investment would surely attract talent from all over the world. In the 1990s, when the nation was creating its economic miracle, Taiwanese companies mainly invested domestically and they attracted large numbers of talented individuals from overseas. For example, Morris Chang (張忠謀), chairman and chief executive of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, moved to Taiwan in 1985 and founded his company here one year later. Who says Taiwan prevents overseas talent from coming here to work?
Last year alone, formal applications from Taiwanese companies for investment in China exceeded US$10 billion. Add on other investments for which applications were never filed and the total amount of Taiwanese investments in China last year exceeded US$20 billion. This is equivalent to 57 percent of the major private investments in Taiwan — US$35 billion — and 27 percent of the nation’s total private investment — US$73 billion. With such massive capital outflows to China, it would be another miracle if the talented Taiwanese individuals were not attracted to China. It is clear that it is the over-heated “China fever” that causes the outflow of talent.
Taiwan’s pro-China media have attached great importance to Shanmugaratnam’s “Taiwan story” and are using it to attack the government’s policy for attracting foreign talent. But what is it that they really want? They want the government to relax its regulations restricting the import of talented Chinese individuals in order to realize their dream of a “one China” market as soon as possible.
The true story of Taiwan, then, is the story of how, over the past dozen years, China has attracted more than US$20 billion away from Taiwan every year, reaching a total of more than US$400 billion. It is the story of how national industry has been hollowed out, how the average salary has declined to the same level it was 13 years ago, how youth unemployment has continued to increase, how the brain drain has never stopped and how the wealth gap has rapidly widened. While all this has been going on, the public suffers and the suicide rate keeps climbing.
Indeed, the lost 13 years are a unique period in modern eastern economic history. This is the true Taiwan Story.
Huang Tien-lin is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by EDDY Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS