Following the presidential election in January, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been busy discussing the reason for their defeat. Some say that “We must understand China,” as if the reason for the party’s defeat at the ballot box was that it didn’t adhere to the “understand China, avoid misunderstandings” slogan formerly used by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to promote pro-China policy. Today, this phrase has become the mantra of some people in the DPP, which leaves me at a loss for words.
The question is if the public, including the DPP, really doesn’t understand China or even misunderstands it.
Since contact between the West and China began hundreds of years ago, there have been tens of thousands of books written in many languages that explore various aspects of Chinese society and people — books about China’s history, society, politics, diplomacy, military, laws, economics, culture, education, art, sports, agriculture, labor, environment, nationalism, corruption — and, in particular, its designs on Taiwan.
Many universities around the world, including universities in Taiwan, have a Chinese studies center, and millions of Taiwanese travel to China every year for business, tourism, investigations, studies, to find a spouse, escape criminal prosecution or worship. Likewise, countless numbers of Chinese, in an official or private capacity, come to Taiwan every year for “exchanges” — tourism, visiting relatives, studying, prostitution and infiltration — and many Chinese universities also have Taiwanese studies centers.
Taiwanese and Chinese people have a better understanding of each other than they have of anyone else in the world. I simply cannot see how there could be any room at all for lack of understanding or misunderstandings between the two.
After World War II, disputes between Taiwanese and Chinese have not been based on a lack of understanding, but on the fact that the two differ too greatly in various ways, including history, identity, politics, geography, education, ideas, national character and value systems.
Someone once said that a man and a woman marry due to a misunderstanding, the mistake of believing that they belong together, and then divorce as a result of understanding when they finally see that they don’t. The same kind of reasoning can be applied to states. Once one party wants to force their will onto the other party and bring about union regardless of whether the other party is willing, there will be a problem. What should the party that is about to be raped do? This is where politics and diplomacy come in handy, and it is the reason for their existence. Unless all the sudden calls for “understanding China” have some other meaning, it’s all just a lot of nonsense.
Peng Ming-min is a former senior political adviser to the president.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS