Following the presidential election in January, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been busy discussing the reason for their defeat. Some say that “We must understand China,” as if the reason for the party’s defeat at the ballot box was that it didn’t adhere to the “understand China, avoid misunderstandings” slogan formerly used by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to promote pro-China policy. Today, this phrase has become the mantra of some people in the DPP, which leaves me at a loss for words.
The question is if the public, including the DPP, really doesn’t understand China or even misunderstands it.
Since contact between the West and China began hundreds of years ago, there have been tens of thousands of books written in many languages that explore various aspects of Chinese society and people — books about China’s history, society, politics, diplomacy, military, laws, economics, culture, education, art, sports, agriculture, labor, environment, nationalism, corruption — and, in particular, its designs on Taiwan.
Many universities around the world, including universities in Taiwan, have a Chinese studies center, and millions of Taiwanese travel to China every year for business, tourism, investigations, studies, to find a spouse, escape criminal prosecution or worship. Likewise, countless numbers of Chinese, in an official or private capacity, come to Taiwan every year for “exchanges” — tourism, visiting relatives, studying, prostitution and infiltration — and many Chinese universities also have Taiwanese studies centers.
Taiwanese and Chinese people have a better understanding of each other than they have of anyone else in the world. I simply cannot see how there could be any room at all for lack of understanding or misunderstandings between the two.
After World War II, disputes between Taiwanese and Chinese have not been based on a lack of understanding, but on the fact that the two differ too greatly in various ways, including history, identity, politics, geography, education, ideas, national character and value systems.
Someone once said that a man and a woman marry due to a misunderstanding, the mistake of believing that they belong together, and then divorce as a result of understanding when they finally see that they don’t. The same kind of reasoning can be applied to states. Once one party wants to force their will onto the other party and bring about union regardless of whether the other party is willing, there will be a problem. What should the party that is about to be raped do? This is where politics and diplomacy come in handy, and it is the reason for their existence. Unless all the sudden calls for “understanding China” have some other meaning, it’s all just a lot of nonsense.
Peng Ming-min is a former senior political adviser to the president.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS