Following the presidential election in January, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been busy discussing the reason for their defeat. Some say that “We must understand China,” as if the reason for the party’s defeat at the ballot box was that it didn’t adhere to the “understand China, avoid misunderstandings” slogan formerly used by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to promote pro-China policy. Today, this phrase has become the mantra of some people in the DPP, which leaves me at a loss for words.
The question is if the public, including the DPP, really doesn’t understand China or even misunderstands it.
Since contact between the West and China began hundreds of years ago, there have been tens of thousands of books written in many languages that explore various aspects of Chinese society and people — books about China’s history, society, politics, diplomacy, military, laws, economics, culture, education, art, sports, agriculture, labor, environment, nationalism, corruption — and, in particular, its designs on Taiwan.
Many universities around the world, including universities in Taiwan, have a Chinese studies center, and millions of Taiwanese travel to China every year for business, tourism, investigations, studies, to find a spouse, escape criminal prosecution or worship. Likewise, countless numbers of Chinese, in an official or private capacity, come to Taiwan every year for “exchanges” — tourism, visiting relatives, studying, prostitution and infiltration — and many Chinese universities also have Taiwanese studies centers.
Taiwanese and Chinese people have a better understanding of each other than they have of anyone else in the world. I simply cannot see how there could be any room at all for lack of understanding or misunderstandings between the two.
After World War II, disputes between Taiwanese and Chinese have not been based on a lack of understanding, but on the fact that the two differ too greatly in various ways, including history, identity, politics, geography, education, ideas, national character and value systems.
Someone once said that a man and a woman marry due to a misunderstanding, the mistake of believing that they belong together, and then divorce as a result of understanding when they finally see that they don’t. The same kind of reasoning can be applied to states. Once one party wants to force their will onto the other party and bring about union regardless of whether the other party is willing, there will be a problem. What should the party that is about to be raped do? This is where politics and diplomacy come in handy, and it is the reason for their existence. Unless all the sudden calls for “understanding China” have some other meaning, it’s all just a lot of nonsense.
Peng Ming-min is a former senior political adviser to the president.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS