The government yesterday published its first report on human rights based on the UN covenants that are now part of the nation’s legal system. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said the report marked another milestone in Taiwan’s efforts to meet international standards. Ironically, the report, both through its inclusions and omissions, highlights just how far this nation has to go — even as its place on the world stage grows ever smaller and international attention paid to it dwindles.
The Chinese-language report compiled by the Presidential Office’s advisory panel on human rights covers a wide range of issues, from the death penalty to gender ratios to welfare budgets. However, most of the media attention was focused on the issue of capital punishment, and how far away Taiwan is from abolishing it, even though many other issues, such as migrant rights, gender equality and freedom of expression, are equally important.
The government is working to address capital punishment, the report said, highlighting a 67.4 percent reduction in the number of death sentences in the past decade compared with the previous decade. What the government glosses over is that most of that reduction came during the eight years that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was in office, and that it was under Ma that the government ended a four-year moratorium on executions begun in 2006 under the DPP. Once again, in the report, the Ma government has used a lack of public consensus on abolishing capital punishment as an excuse to uphold the death penalty.
Ma’s reaction to the divergence between where Taiwan is now and where it should be, based on international standards, was to urge government agencies to set an example by boosting civics education for public servants. Why focus on bureaucrats when there are so many other sectors of society that could benefit from such programs? Also, why is Ma ignoring the fact that Taiwan’s presence on the global stage grows smaller with each passing year, if not month, while its absence from the international limelight goes unremarked?
For example, another report was published on Thursday by the Asia Society and the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, titled Rising to the Top, which examined women’s leadership in Asia, their accomplishments, problems and what hinders their economic, business and political advancement. The report warned that women constitute a pool of talent that is still underused throughout much of the Asian region, costing it US$89 billion annually in lost productivity, which could severely hamper its growth.
Most of the statistics in the government report came from private and academic sources, including the UN and the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Report. This report was filled with interesting figures, comparisons and suggestions, ranging from women among Asia’s rich and powerful, to governmental participation, life expectancy and educational attainment, the remuneration gap and political empowerment. There was just one problem, like the Gender Gap reports before it — Taiwan is nowhere to be found in Rising to the Top.
In a report on a key issue of importance to women in this country and to the region, Taiwan plays no role. Its contributions and problems are completely overlooked, though China figures prominently. However, the situation in China is very different from that of Taiwan and the problems, forecasts and solutions cannot just be extrapolated across the Taiwan Strait.
The government plans to publish a human rights report each year from now on to ensure Taiwan’s human rights situation continues to improve, Ma said yesterday. It eventually plans to publish an English-language translation of this year’s report so experts worldwide can read it. While we applaud the ambition, given the lack of attention paid by global experts to Taiwan unless cross-strait matters are at issue, will anyone really care? Or will these reports become just another meaningless achievement of the Ma administration, gathering dust on shelves?
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS