US beef containing traces of ractopamine — a drug that is likely to cause chronic health hazards in the long run — will soon be imported to Taiwan. Unless a deadly case of acute toxicity is suddenly reported in Taiwan, food safety will soon be threatened, despite President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) claims that people will be safe if they do not buy or eat it.
Ractopamine poses four types of health risk to humans. First, it can cause heart palpitations. It might cause cardiac hypertrophy, heart arrhythmia and even heart failure. It can also be fatal in healthy adults without a history of heart disease.
Second, it can cause increased levels of blood sugar.
Third, it can cause a decrease of potassium ions. For patients with kidney diseases who are incapable of balancing electrolytes and must have regular dialysis, this would mean extended periods of dialysis and their disease could worsen.
Fourth, because the liver in babies under 18 months old is unable to produce enzymes to metabolize ractopamine, the drug would remain in their livers and kidneys, becoming dangerous to their health.
Ma said it would be impossible for Taiwan to join the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership (TPP) if the US does not resume bilateral talks on the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA). The implication is that these talks would not be resumed if Taipei does not relax the ban on beef containing ractopamine residues.
It is hard to estimate the benefits that a TPP would bring to Taiwanese, but what we can be certain of is that the public as a whole will suffer from poor health and this will be a great setback to the nation.
It will be a setback because once a new amendment is passed, ractopamine will no longer be a banned substance and this will bring chaos to Taiwan’s high-quality meat market. Cattle and pig farmers will not have to work as hard as they did before and they will be able to use ractopamine to cut costs. Not only will those pig farmers already using ractopamine continue to do so, other pig farmers will also start using it.
The next setback is that although we know that meat might contain ractopamine, we will still have to eat it. This is because it will be cheaper and because everything is increasing in price while salaries remain stagnant, we will be unable to purchase more expensive and safer meat products.
An even greater setback will be that only people of economic means, which allows them to access safe meat products, will be able to enjoy meat free of ractopamine. When this happens, eating safe meat products will become a special privilege of the bourgeoisie.
Basic human needs such as physical health and food safety will become new social issues, accelerating the arrival of an “M-shaped society” — a polarized society with extremes of rich and poor.
Over a decade ago, when social movements became very popular, I took to the streets. On April 1 this year, I took my children to Taipei to take part in a demonstration about food safety. I did this to emphasize the basic need of having safe food to eat.
On the Web site of global pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly & Co the company talks about how honesty, fairness and respect for others are its core values.
Honesty, fairness and respect for others?
These are just the big words that pharmaceutical companies and politicians use to package the profits they make from the public.
Chang Ming-chun is an executive committee member of the Taichung branch of the Homemakers United Foundation.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Drew Cameron
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS