President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) managed to dupe voters into re-electing him in January, but his second term in office does not officially start until next month. Ma is using this period to push through a series of unpopular policies, including relaxing the import ban on beef containing traces of the feed additive ractopamine, implementing steep fuel and electricity price hikes, imposing new taxes, opening the gates wider to Chinese investment and proposing the notion that China and Taiwan are two areas of a single country. This barrage of policy shocks has thrown Taiwan into disarray. It looks as though Ma’s plan is to lay the blame for all these unpopular policies on his subordinates so that he can begin his second term with his reputation intact.
Let us focus on Ma’s China policy. Two months have passed since then-Chongqing vice mayor Wang Lijun (王立軍) briefly took refuge in the US consulate in Chengdu, in China’s Sichuan Province. Following that incident, then-Chongqing party boss Bo Xilai (薄熙來) was removed from his post, and later from the politburo, and most recently, his wife was arrested on suspicion of murder. In the wake of these events, all kinds of rumors have been circulating about power struggles among China’s top leaders. The main reason why such rumors abound is that in China, where everything is done behind closed doors, various factions have been releasing information that they think will benefit themselves and allowing these rumors to circulate.
While China’s top leaders are busy handling their internal struggles, the lower ranks are trying to trim their sails and steer by the wind so that they do not end up on the wrong side. Given this situation, China’s policies on Taiwan are largely on hold, with decisions being left until the dust has settled. As top Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials in Beijing jostle for position in the run-up to the party’s 18th National Congress, which is scheduled for autumn, only minor adjustments can be expected in China’s Taiwan policies, lest they cause an upset in the leadership rankings. That would explain why China has not responded to the proposal for a cross-strait peace agreement that Ma made last year or the “one country, two areas” concept that his envoy to Beijing brought up more recently. China would prefer to observe what Ma says and does and gauge Taiwanese’s reactions.
Now that Bo has been removed from his government and party posts, Taiwanese businesspeople with investments in Chongqing are worried about whether his administration’s preferential policies will continue.
Although Bo’s successor has promised that these policies will continue, the worry is that Bo’s administration raised loans amounting to 500 billion yuan (US$79.28 billion) to cover extra spending intended to curry favor with the public and foreign investors, while Chongqing’s annual revenue is only about 100 billion yuan. In effect, the city is bankrupt. This news was revealed by Xinhua news agency journalist Zhou Fang (周方), who has been studying Bo’s -“Chongqing model” for a long time. Given the circumstances, it is questionable how long the policies initiated by Bo can continue. Ma and Bo definitely have something in common when it comes to this kind of governing style.
Since last year, about 30 Chinese-owned companies that, under strict US regulations, failed to make a profit on the US stock market have withdrawn from US stock listings and gone back to the more loosely regulated Chinese and Hong Kong stock markets.
Recently, however, several Chinese-owned private companies listed on Hong Kong’s stock market have seen their share prices plunge or have even been suspended from trading because of irregularities in their accounts, and the problem is still spreading.
After China lowered its annual economic growth target from 8 to 7.5 percent for this year, an increasing number of companies are likely to get into trouble. Care must be taken lest colluding officials in Taiwan allow these companies to list on Taiwan’s stock market and bamboozle Taiwanese investors out of their money.
In light of the current situation, Ma should help keep things calm by following the road safety motto — stop, look and listen. He should keep quiet and watch out for any changes in China’s political situation, especially whether it is swinging to the left or right, and then propose China policies that are most advantageous to Taiwan.
Unfortunately, however, Ma is running his government more like a circus, putting all his policies on show right down to the bottom line. With all of Ma’s cards on display, China can easily choose the best way to keep Taiwan under control.
Ma should put political issues related to China on hold and avoid making big moves on economic issues. What he should not do is risk hurting Taiwan’s interests by making over-hasty responses to China.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS