For people like me, who were born in Taiwan and later immigrated to the US, April 10 is a special day.
It is the day each year when Taiwanese--Americans take a moment to express gratitude in some way, shape or form to this great and proud nation of ours — the US.
Taiwan and the US have been close friends and allies for close to seven decades, but when the US government shifted diplomatic relations from Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in January 1979, Taiwan was doomed to be left vulnerable to annexation by its bully neighbor, China.
However, the US Congress quickly passed the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) to ensure that the US would continue its robust engagement with Taiwan in the areas of security, commerce and culture. Most importantly, with its security guarantees, the TRA enabled Taiwan to continue functioning as an independent country.
With former US president Jimmy Carter’s signature on April 10, 1979, this important and lasting piece of legislation became the “law of the land” and served as the statutory basis for US-Taiwan relations from then on.
Thirty-three years later, the TRA still stands as a model of congressional leadership in the history of US foreign relations. Together with former US president Ronald Reagan’s “six assurances” three years later (which served as further guidelines for US-Taiwan relations), the TRA remains the cornerstone of a very mutually beneficial relationship between the US and Taiwan.
The foresight of the TRA’s drafters in affirming “the preservation and enhancement of the human rights of all the people on Taiwan” as explicit objectives of the US has contributed in large measure to make Taiwan what it is today — a vibrant, open society governed by democratic institutions.
However, even as I write, Taiwanese continue to live under the shadow of more than 1,400 short and medium-range ballistic missiles that China has aimed at them.
The PRC persists in claiming that Taiwan is a “renegade province,” refusing to renounce the use of force against Taiwan and preventing 23 million Taiwanese from declaring formal independence.
It is therefore important to recall that, as reaffirmed by the TRA, the US’ decision to establish diplomatic relations with the PRC was based on the expectation that the future of Taiwan would be determined by peaceful means.
The principled stance of the TRA on behalf of human rights has been instrumental to maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait for more than 30 years, in spite of the growing military threat posed by the PRC.
In gratitude and appreciation to the US, I invite my fellow countrymen and my former countrymen in Taiwan to join me in commemorating the 33rd anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act.
Thank you, the US, for keeping Taiwan free.
Mark Kao is the president of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS