It is not easy to bring people together to take action for a common cause, either at a local level or internationally. However, Earth Hour has managed to do so in just five years.
More than 5,200 cities or towns in more than 130 nations and territories, including Taiwan — an estimated 1.8 billion people in all — joined together last year, turning their lights off for an hour to show their support for action against climate change.
The idea for Earth Hour came from the World Wildlife Fund Australia, which in 2007 convinced 2.2. million Sydney residents and 2,000 businesses to turn off their lights for an hour in a show of commitment on climate change. The plan was to expand the hour-long event to all of Australia the following year, but Canada led more than 30 nations in signing up and the event quickly became a global phenomenon.
Now, Earth Hour is held on the last Saturday in March, close to the equinox, to try to ensure that most cities will be in darkness at 8:30pm.
This year’s lights out campaign will take place tonight from 8:30pm to 9:30pm and 100 landmark buildings around Taiwan have been invited to join the campaign.
Will turning off the lights for an hour, no matter how many people, cities and nations take part, really make a difference in the battle to reduce the damage climate change is causing?
No. Rather the impetus — and the importance — comes from making the gesture, in making people think about the amount of energy they consume, about the impact they have on the environment and what they can do to reduce their carbon footprint.
It also gives a push to both private businesses and governments around the world to think about what is needed, which is a commitment to clean energy research and development. That is why this year the event is expanding with the Earth Hour City Challenge, in which cities in Canada, Italy, Sweden, India and the US have been invited to devise urban development plans to substantially increase the amount of energy they get from renewable sources.
According to Earth Hour, more than 70 percent of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions are created by cities, so changing the way cities operate can make a difference. The idea is to create plans that will not only make the cities cleaner and greener, but boost residents’ living standards as well.
While this year’s contest is open only to cities in five countries, next year it will be thrown wide open, so perhaps urban planners in Taiwan could put on their thinking caps and start coming up with ideas.
Cynics may sneer that Earth Hour is little more than a publicity stunt, but optimists respond that it is a start — and the event’s exponential growth does give cause for hope, since climate change is a problem that people across the globe and across the economic spectrum have to deal with.
However, the real test comes from the daily grind of putting into practice a commitment to reducing the amount of energy we use — taking public transportation, walking or biking instead of jumping into a car or a motorcycle, reducing consumption of electricity, especially the use of air conditioning, making homes and businesses greener and more energy efficient.
Such changes are not always easy — nor are they inexpensive — but they are crucial and they become more so every year. So when 8:30pm rolls around tonight, stop and think about what you can do, what your company or organization can do, and what Taiwan can do to reduce this nation’s carbon footprint and increase its use of renewable energy.
Future generations will thank you for it.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS