Sovereignty takes a hit
Freedom ends not with a bang, but a whimper. This could be the fate of Taiwan’s independence if the current administration continues its apparent course of refining the definition of bilateral talks between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
With the recent comments by former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) that the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) supports not only the notion of “one country, two areas” (一國兩區), but also views the relationship between the two as “special,” as opposed to “state-to-state,” the Taiwanese government has clearly resigned itself to playing the role of something other than a state-to-state actor in the ongoing negotiations between the two countries.
In doing so, Taiwan has relegated itself to little more than an area that is ultimately subject to PRC authority and oversight, in much the way that Kurdistan is viewed within Iraq, or the Basque region of Spain and Russian region of Chechnya are viewed; trouble-making regions of a greater sovereign state.
The ability of Taiwan to negotiate as an equal with the PRC has been greatly diminished, not only in a bilateral sense, but in the eyes of the world as well.
If Taiwan itself does not assert its independence from the PRC, then it should not be surprised when other states prove lukewarm about the cause.
Taiwan’s status as a sovereign state, as well as its ability to negotiate on an equal footing with the PRC, have been severely undermined by the current government and it is a sad day for both democracy and Taiwanese.
Brian Benedictus
Washington
Seeking justice
A recent story “Food additive firm owner sentenced to 13 years in jail,” (March 21, page 2”) left readers with a concerning lack of finality.
Although justice appears to have been done in the case of suppliers of these toxic chemicals, nothing is mentioned about ongoing prosecutions of the executives and corporations who actually put these poisons into our food.
We would all feel more assured if we thought that the chief executive of Uni--President International and others of his ilk were about to the see the inside of a jail cell.
Is this about to happen? Tomorrow? Next week? Or never?
John Hanna
Taoyuan
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS