Sovereignty takes a hit
Freedom ends not with a bang, but a whimper. This could be the fate of Taiwan’s independence if the current administration continues its apparent course of refining the definition of bilateral talks between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
With the recent comments by former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) that the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) supports not only the notion of “one country, two areas” (一國兩區), but also views the relationship between the two as “special,” as opposed to “state-to-state,” the Taiwanese government has clearly resigned itself to playing the role of something other than a state-to-state actor in the ongoing negotiations between the two countries.
In doing so, Taiwan has relegated itself to little more than an area that is ultimately subject to PRC authority and oversight, in much the way that Kurdistan is viewed within Iraq, or the Basque region of Spain and Russian region of Chechnya are viewed; trouble-making regions of a greater sovereign state.
The ability of Taiwan to negotiate as an equal with the PRC has been greatly diminished, not only in a bilateral sense, but in the eyes of the world as well.
If Taiwan itself does not assert its independence from the PRC, then it should not be surprised when other states prove lukewarm about the cause.
Taiwan’s status as a sovereign state, as well as its ability to negotiate on an equal footing with the PRC, have been severely undermined by the current government and it is a sad day for both democracy and Taiwanese.
Brian Benedictus
Washington
Seeking justice
A recent story “Food additive firm owner sentenced to 13 years in jail,” (March 21, page 2”) left readers with a concerning lack of finality.
Although justice appears to have been done in the case of suppliers of these toxic chemicals, nothing is mentioned about ongoing prosecutions of the executives and corporations who actually put these poisons into our food.
We would all feel more assured if we thought that the chief executive of Uni--President International and others of his ilk were about to the see the inside of a jail cell.
Is this about to happen? Tomorrow? Next week? Or never?
John Hanna
Taoyuan
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS