When the Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) was appointed, it was said his new Cabinet would provide peace and security for the nation. With the crises over US beef imports and the outbreak of H5N2 avian influenza there seems to be a noticeable breakdown in communication between the government and the public. No one appears sure about what is going on and consumers have lost confidence in the safety of beef and chicken products.
There have been meetings on how to proceed at all governmental levels, from the Presidential Office, to the Council of Agriculture, the Department of Health and local governments. However, the public has been left completely in the dark, so these administrative powwows do little to alleviate the confusion. The problems drag on, unresolved, and the public has started losing faith in the government’s ability to cope.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) told American Institute in Taiwan Chairman Raymond Burghardt last month that the “new Cabinet will have a new approach.” No guesses as to what the administration’s stance is on the matter, then.
The opposition and experts have been arguing the point back and forth, but how many countries in the world ban imported ractopamine-injected meat? The government has not been forthcoming about how ractopamine affects cattle and pigs, or what kind of effect it has on people who consume such meat over an extended period of time. The government has called many meetings at the Presidential Office, merely repeating the mantra that its first consideration is the public’s health and that there is no predetermined stance or timetable in place.
This prevarication; this inaction; this opacity, is trying the patience of the public, experts, the opposition and the US. Some pan-blue legislators have even proposed taking the decision over US beef imports out of the hands of the Cabinet and making it a legal issue, further restricting the administration’s control over the decision.
A suspected outbreak of H5N2 avian influenza in chickens was first brought to the attention of the council in December last year by documentary filmmaker Kevin H. J. Lee (李惠仁), but it took the council more than two months to act, with a preemptive cull of tens of thousands of chickens only done recently. There have been accusations of a government cover-up, Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine director Hsu Tien-lai (許天來) resigned and prosecutors have raided the bureau’s offices.
The clinical results regarding the presence of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Taiwan are inconclusive, as infected chickens are still alive and producing eggs. The council therefore decided to call successive meetings with experts to discuss the issue, although the public once again had no idea what was concluded.
Valuable time is being wasted. Academics say that to prevent the mutation of the virus and to stop it from being transmitted to humans, we should be undertaking comprehensive testing of farms for virus antibodies. The council only calls more meetings.
The crux of the problem is something that everyone was aware of even before the Jan. 14 presidential election: The Ma administration is incompetent with regard to decisionmaking, communication and governance. It is uncomfortable taking responsibility. It does not matter how many meetings with experts are held, it is not going to help dispel the public’s suspicions or fears, or prevent the collapse of their faith in the government. The premier says the Cabinet understands the importance of food safety, but when it is being coy with information and thinks more meetings are the answer to everything, when it studiously fails to address problems, the public’s ordeal drags on and its dissatisfaction with the administration grows.
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Delegation-level visits between the two countries have become an integral part of transformed relations between India and the US. Therefore, the visit by a bipartisan group of seven US lawmakers, led by US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul to India from June 16 to Thursday last week would have largely gone unnoticed in India and abroad. However, the US delegation’s four-day visit to India assumed huge importance this time, because of the meeting between the US lawmakers and the Dalai Lama. This in turn brings us to the focal question: How and to what extent