Following Taiwan’s presidential elections in 2008 and 2012, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) seems to have gained insights that enabled him to refine his Taiwan policy. Later this year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will go through a leadership change at the party’s 18th National Congress, and Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平), who is widely considered to be Hu’s likely successor, looks set to continue Hu’s policy of expanding cross-strait exchanges and using economic means to force political talks.
The Chinese government’s economic strategy behind its push in Taiwanese cities and counties ruled by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been to use procurement and investment delegations to win the support of the agricultural, fishery and livestock industries as well as small and medium enterprises; tourist groups to win over the tourism and hospitality industries, and the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) to win the support of the manufacturing industry.
However, from the perspective of globalization and free trade, China’s strategy of using economic means to force political talks with Taiwan cannot last for long.
First, Taiwan’s benefits from the ECFA are limited. Since China and Taiwan signed the ECFA, 539 items have been listed on the “early harvest” list. This only accounts for 16 percent of the nation’s export items, which of course means that 84 percent of all export items are not on the list. Meanwhile, China launched negotiations with the 10 ASEAN member countries on tariff reductions last year, and it is also set to sign bilateral trade agreements with Japan and South Korea. The trend toward free-trade agreements (FTAs) has restricted the space for China to offer Taiwan advantages by cutting tariffs.
Second, the US has decided to “return to Asia” through the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). In November last year, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton published an article, “America’s Pacific Century,” in Foreign Policy magazine, declaring the US’ determination to return to Asia. US President Barack Obama has further used the TPP to co-opt the US’ major allies in the Asian-Pacific region, such as Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Australia, New Zealand and Taiwan. The US hopes to counterbalance China with the TPP — the world’s largest free-trade economic community.
Third, the effects of China’s procurement delegations and tourist groups are falling short of expectations. Although the Chinese government orders provinces and cities to “adopt” Taiwanese counties and cities for procurement purposes, politically controlled procurement is no match for the market economy. Chinese leaders from many provinces and cities have made high-profile visits to Taiwan, bragging about the huge amounts of money they will spend on purchasing and signing letters of intent. In the end, a lot of this was just empty promises.
These three issues are the key factors, but there are others, such as China’s domestic economic bubble and inflationary pressures. All these factors have reduced China’s ability to use economic means to force political talks with Taiwan.
The DPP should systematically cultivate its own Chinese experts to be able to provide effective and long-term cross-strait policy analysis based on the international situation. This should help save the party from empty talk and instead allow it to construct a cross-strait discourse and policy with a Taiwanese identity.
Hung Chi-kune is a member of the Democratic Progressive Party’s Central Executive Committee.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS