Tsai’s defeat beyond belief
I went back to Taiwan to vote in the Jan. 14 presidential election. Frankly, I feel surprised and puzzled that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was defeated.
Two weeks before the elections, polls showed this would be a tight race. Many polls showed Tsai had a commanding lead after out-performing the other candidates in three debates. Throughout the campaign, Tsai seemed to be very popular and enjoy a lot of support from voters.
On the other hand, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), in the last week of his campaign, together with his wife, carried out only a few activities, such as canvasing streets and receiving symbolic gifts, which are normally restricted to the start of a campaign. In other words, his campaign lacked momentum and he was keeping a low profile. Apparently he was losing voter support.
During my stay in Taiwan, most people I was in contact with had the optimistic expectation that Tsai would win the election.
During a bus tour with 26 relatives, we had a poll that showed Tsai receiving 17 votes, Ma three votes and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) three votes. Probably the results were like this because we are all Hoklo and my relatives are all upper middle-class, with five teachers among them.
Anyway, Tsai lost the election. Besides the inherent unfairness and the abuse of the government apparatus, China, business tycoons and the US — especially former director of the American Institute in Taiwan Douglas Paal — did irreparable damage to Tsai’s campaign.
Still, a big question is what was the scale of abuse from the government apparatus. Especially, whether the technicalities of vote counting and tallying were transparent, fair and impartial, or had been tampered with.
Ma could not arouse support before the election, but he won big. This is really fishy.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Doing a job on Jobs
Recently there has been a lot of TV airplay for Action Electronics’ ad campaign for the Action Pad tablet. The ad features a Steve Jobs impersonator, which is in very poor taste (“Android maker uses fake ‘Steve Jobs’ to plug device,” Feb. 3, page 2).
This campaign does not just cross the line of common business courtesy, respect and decorum, but completely ignores and leaps over it. The commercial and campaign, with its similar-style press conferences, are receiving some pretty harsh criticism worldwide.
Every person that I have spoken with in Taiwan and elsewhere over the past few days regarding this campaign finds it wholly in bad taste.
What is more troubling is that some of the more uninformed criticism from around the world is directed at Taiwan as a nation, and not at Action Electronics, which duly deserves it.
As businesspeople, investors and consumers, we must sometimes stand up for what is right, or we risk heading into a terrible downward spiral.
Personally, I am not a Jobs fanatic: I still use a Windows-based PC and a Blackberry, but I do believe respect and common courtesy should be exercised within business and marketing. Further, I do realize that Jobs is being portrayed in the ad as an angel, but he is also being impersonated as when he was in his most unhealthy state, a man battling with terminal cancer.
This campaign is not only offensive to Jobs’ family, friends, fans and colleagues, but really to anyone who has had or is battling cancer, or who knows someone who has or has had cancer — a large percentage of the population.
As a financial analyst and investment manager and a capitalist at heart, I believe in the free market and that the best product at the best price should always prevail.
However, the tactics to market and sell one’s product should never border on the unethical and show such a complete disregard of common courtesy.
For example, HTC, Samsung and other Android-based tablets and smartphones have taken a major market share without resorting to such disrespectful sales tactics, and that is the main point — if your product is good, which the Action Pad actually appears to be, based on reviews — it will sell, and there is no need for such tasteless ad campaigns.
I fully understand that “all publicity is good publicity,” but where should the line be drawn?
This marketing campaign should be re-evaluated as I believe that it may do more harm than good to Action Electronics’ investors and the good reputation of this fine company.
It is disappointing, as one would expect more considered business decisions from such a highly respected company and team of executives.
Chen Jia Fong
Linkou, New Taipei City
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS