Tsai’s defeat beyond belief
I went back to Taiwan to vote in the Jan. 14 presidential election. Frankly, I feel surprised and puzzled that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was defeated.
Two weeks before the elections, polls showed this would be a tight race. Many polls showed Tsai had a commanding lead after out-performing the other candidates in three debates. Throughout the campaign, Tsai seemed to be very popular and enjoy a lot of support from voters.
On the other hand, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), in the last week of his campaign, together with his wife, carried out only a few activities, such as canvasing streets and receiving symbolic gifts, which are normally restricted to the start of a campaign. In other words, his campaign lacked momentum and he was keeping a low profile. Apparently he was losing voter support.
During my stay in Taiwan, most people I was in contact with had the optimistic expectation that Tsai would win the election.
During a bus tour with 26 relatives, we had a poll that showed Tsai receiving 17 votes, Ma three votes and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) three votes. Probably the results were like this because we are all Hoklo and my relatives are all upper middle-class, with five teachers among them.
Anyway, Tsai lost the election. Besides the inherent unfairness and the abuse of the government apparatus, China, business tycoons and the US — especially former director of the American Institute in Taiwan Douglas Paal — did irreparable damage to Tsai’s campaign.
Still, a big question is what was the scale of abuse from the government apparatus. Especially, whether the technicalities of vote counting and tallying were transparent, fair and impartial, or had been tampered with.
Ma could not arouse support before the election, but he won big. This is really fishy.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Doing a job on Jobs
Recently there has been a lot of TV airplay for Action Electronics’ ad campaign for the Action Pad tablet. The ad features a Steve Jobs impersonator, which is in very poor taste (“Android maker uses fake ‘Steve Jobs’ to plug device,” Feb. 3, page 2).
This campaign does not just cross the line of common business courtesy, respect and decorum, but completely ignores and leaps over it. The commercial and campaign, with its similar-style press conferences, are receiving some pretty harsh criticism worldwide.
Every person that I have spoken with in Taiwan and elsewhere over the past few days regarding this campaign finds it wholly in bad taste.
What is more troubling is that some of the more uninformed criticism from around the world is directed at Taiwan as a nation, and not at Action Electronics, which duly deserves it.
As businesspeople, investors and consumers, we must sometimes stand up for what is right, or we risk heading into a terrible downward spiral.
Personally, I am not a Jobs fanatic: I still use a Windows-based PC and a Blackberry, but I do believe respect and common courtesy should be exercised within business and marketing. Further, I do realize that Jobs is being portrayed in the ad as an angel, but he is also being impersonated as when he was in his most unhealthy state, a man battling with terminal cancer.
This campaign is not only offensive to Jobs’ family, friends, fans and colleagues, but really to anyone who has had or is battling cancer, or who knows someone who has or has had cancer — a large percentage of the population.
As a financial analyst and investment manager and a capitalist at heart, I believe in the free market and that the best product at the best price should always prevail.
However, the tactics to market and sell one’s product should never border on the unethical and show such a complete disregard of common courtesy.
For example, HTC, Samsung and other Android-based tablets and smartphones have taken a major market share without resorting to such disrespectful sales tactics, and that is the main point — if your product is good, which the Action Pad actually appears to be, based on reviews — it will sell, and there is no need for such tasteless ad campaigns.
I fully understand that “all publicity is good publicity,” but where should the line be drawn?
This marketing campaign should be re-evaluated as I believe that it may do more harm than good to Action Electronics’ investors and the good reputation of this fine company.
It is disappointing, as one would expect more considered business decisions from such a highly respected company and team of executives.
Chen Jia Fong
Linkou, New Taipei City
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS