Now that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) no longer faces the pressure of getting re-elected, he can be bolder and more determined in his mandate in his second term. However, he should take action in a balanced and measured way, as the major tasks facing him involve not just cross-strait ties with China, but domestic issues and challenging global conditions.
For instance, over the past four years, Ma and his Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government have been criticized for their lackluster performance in creating jobs and narrowing the wealth gap. While they have often touted the benefits of the inking of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) with China to revitalize Taiwan’s economic growth, the fact that the election was so close-fought shows that only a few people and industries have enjoyed the fruits of closer cross-strait trade ties.
Thus, while Ma and his KMT are poised to continue and strengthen existing government policies over the next four years, especially as regards cross-strait economic measures, they need to strike a balance on how fast and how far they can go. Most importantly, they have to remind themselves that the benefits of closer cross-strait trade ties should be directed at more industries and the majority of the people.
The challenges facing the government on this front are threefold.
First, while the ECFA appears to provide business opportunities to Taiwanese firms in China thanks to the “early harvest” list of items enjoying concessionary tariff treatment, sooner or later the bilateral trade pact will offer opportunities for Chinese companies to do business in Taiwan. Eventually it will lead to competition between Taiwanese firms and their Chinese counterparts, in Taiwan and not just China.
Therefore, as the government has shown its intention to promote greater trade and investment liberalization across the Taiwan Strait through the ECFA, it must also carefully negotiate with China over investment protection and double-taxation to protect the interests of Taiwanese businesses.
Second, when the government is paying attention to benefits for Taiwanese firms operating in China, it should not neglect small businesses and the economically disadvantaged in Taiwan. There are clues to why Ma lost votes in certain parts of Taiwan in the election and he must realize the need to address those voters’ dissatisfaction with the government by improving the domestic business environment.
As further ECFA discussions with China might involve more tax reductions for the plastics, fiber, LCD, automobile and machinery industries, they could have both positive and negative impacts on domestic industries. As an increase in Chinese investment in Taiwan through the ECFA is very likely to lead to restructuring and consolidation of local industries, a responsible government needs to take pre-emptive measures to help local companies upgrade production to improve their competitiveness.
Third, the government should not forget about global economic conditions, as the development of an export-oriented Taiwan does not rely solely on China. The government has said it would step up the pace of signing free-trade pacts with other countries, as this is an important move to prevent Taiwan from becoming marginalized in the global economy, but it should proceed cautiously to avoid unfair treatment of domestic industries during the negotiation process.
Ma said on Sunday he wanted to leave a legacy in Taiwan after his second term. The opportunity exists, but it depends not just on his determination, but on how far and how fast he takes action and whether the action is taken in a balanced way.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS