With enthusiasm, though not quite passion, voters have had their say in the presidential and legislative elections. The peaceful and smooth execution of the elections is a sign of deepening and maturing democracy, and democracy in Taiwan is the real winner.
In 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was elected by a margin of more than 2.2 million votes and he was further backed up by his party gaining a near three-quarter legislative majority. His four-year road toward re-election has been filled with scares and dangers, and in the end, he only defeated the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) by a margin of 797,561 votes.
The concern for the nation’s disadvantaged and for the Taiwanese values that Tsai displayed during her campaign received a resounding response from voters, and although she was unable to lead the DPP to victory over Ma and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), she ran an excellent campaign. She lost honorably.
Ma’s campaign focused on the so-called “1992 consensus” and cross-strait relations. In the final moments of the campaign, several business leaders came forward in support of Ma and the consensus. On several occasions, China also said that without the “1992 consensus,” cross-strait relations would be destabilized. These threats from both sides of the Taiwan Strait were effective in frightening many voters into voting for the pan-blue camp.
The question is if Ma’s re-election will mean that cross-strait relations remain stable and continue to develop. Not necessarily.
Over the past few years, China has continued to nurse and support the Ma administration. Paying no attention to cost, Beijing has offered many policy benefits and advantages, what Ma and his government have called “peace dividends.”
Following Ma’s re-election, we can be quite sure that China will no longer keep a low profile in relations with his government, in particular since Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) is scheduled to step down this year. Before he does, he is almost sure to want to make progress on the Taiwan issue as part of his political legacy. We can therefore expect China to increase its pressure on Taiwan.
As revealed in documents published by WikiLeaks, Ma and the KMT’s top leadership are under pressure from Beijing to enter talks with China. Now that China has helped Ma win re-election, Beijing will want to collect on the “political debt” that Ma has racked up.
Ma stressed several times ahead of the election that he would not enter into political talks with Beijing or visit China if re-elected, but judging from his weak political style, it will be up to the opposition, the media and the public to supervise him and see that he sticks to those promises in the face of Chinese pressure, and that Taiwan’s interests and sovereignty do not sustain further damage over the next four years.
Over the past four years, the Ma administration has been criticized over its poor performance, and if it were not for the intervention of the National Stabilization Fund, the stock market could well have dropped to its lowest point in a decade. The unemployment problem has not improved, blue-collar salaries have dropped, housing prices are skyrocketing, the wealth gap is widening and Ma has been unable to deliver on many of his 2008 election promises. These are some of the reasons why Ma’s road to re-election has been so difficult.
In the next four years, both pan-blue and pan-green voters will expect Ma to resuscitate the economy and improve the standard of living. We also hope that the president-elect will not wait until his inauguration on May 20 to get started — a Cabinet reshuffle is of the utmost urgency and the new premier and his Cabinet must roll up their sleeves and start working on saving the economy right now.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic