Entertainer Pai Ping-ping (白冰冰) let her tongue get the better of her in her address on Dec. 18 at a campaign rally for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is seeking re-election, when she apparently implied a causal relationship between Thailand electing a woman prime minister and the disastrous flooding it suffered soon after. It seemed her remark was clearly intended to suggest that voters had better not cast their ballots for Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), otherwise Taiwan could be struck by some kind of disaster.
It was a bizarre thing to say and, not surprisingly, Pai has drawn a lot of flak for her comments. Even Ma, in whose support she was speaking, has called her remarks inappropriate.
In another recent incident, a well-known media pundit reported comments he had heard from people in the south of Taiwan about the allegations that Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has been making about Tsai’s involvement with TaiMed Biologics, formerly known as Yu Chang. The southerners said that the KMT was using its state powers to implicate Tsai in the Yu Chang affair and that this was clearly a case of “bullying our Taiwanese women.”
Meanwhile, some women’s groups have united to form the “I Want a Female President Alliance,” with the aim of getting people to respect and pay more attention to women.
People all tend to focus on Tsai’s gender.
If I were in Tsai’s place, I definitely would not be happy to see voters concentrating on my gender, while ignoring my abilities. This single-minded perception of Tsai implies a “special attitude” toward women, not what one would expect from people with a mature grasp of democracy. Tsai would probably like to tell everyone: “Please, don’t make a big thing of my gender. Tsai Ing-wen is just Tsai Ing-wen, OK?”
Pai suggested that women are potential bringers of disaster. The sympathy that people from the south and civic groups have expressed for Tsai is based on the preconceived idea that women are the weaker sex and are therefore deserving of overbaked empathy and special treatment.
Both these views about women reflect traditional attitudes that value men and boys more highly than women and girls.
When this kind of attitude is applied to a presidential candidate, it can lead people to exaggerating a woman’s achievements. For instance, people say things like: “It’s really impressive that a woman could reach such a high position.” It can also lead people to hold a woman candidate in contempt and ignore her abilities. Pai’s remark is a typical example of the latter.
The result could be that Tsai wins votes because people sympathize with her as a “disadvantaged” candidate. Equally, if people get the idea that Tsai would attract disasters, she could lose votes because of silly prejudices.
If we judge a candidate on appearances only, how can we elect a leader who is really capable of taking the nation forward? To take gender as the basis for deciding whether or not a candidate is suitable as head of state is no less ridiculous than judging whether people are good or bad according to whether they are considered beautiful or ugly. It seems our society has still not shaken off the shackles of this kind of superficial mindset or escaped from traditional attitudes that underestimate women — at least not in our collective subconscious.
Could it be because most people are conditioned by traditional attitudes and constrained by appearances that elections in Taiwan cannot be conducted according to the ideas candidates put forward, how they perform in policy debates and what they have achieved in or out of government? Is that why candidates always try to win votes by dirty tricks designed to denigrate their opponents? No wonder the recent debate between KMT legislative candidate Chiu Yi (邱毅) and independent pan-green candidate Chen Chih-chung (陳致中) was so acrimonious, with both men using issues to do with women to sling mud at each other.
It looks as though candidates are not the only ones to blame for the fact that Taiwan’s electoral culture has got stuck in a rut and never seems to improve. Shouldn’t voters also take a long hard look at their own grasp of democratic principles?
Everyone these days is more or less agreed about equality of the sexes; so please, everyone, let’s just forget that Tsai happens to be a woman. Instead, let’s scrutinize her learning, knowledge and experience and then decide whether she is capable of taking Taiwan forward.
In other words, let’s judge Tsai in just the same way we judge Ma.
Hsu Yu-fang is associate professor and chairman of Sinophone literatures at National Dong Hua University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
RSS