Entertainer Pai Ping-ping (白冰冰) let her tongue get the better of her in her address on Dec. 18 at a campaign rally for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is seeking re-election, when she apparently implied a causal relationship between Thailand electing a woman prime minister and the disastrous flooding it suffered soon after. It seemed her remark was clearly intended to suggest that voters had better not cast their ballots for Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), otherwise Taiwan could be struck by some kind of disaster.
It was a bizarre thing to say and, not surprisingly, Pai has drawn a lot of flak for her comments. Even Ma, in whose support she was speaking, has called her remarks inappropriate.
In another recent incident, a well-known media pundit reported comments he had heard from people in the south of Taiwan about the allegations that Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has been making about Tsai’s involvement with TaiMed Biologics, formerly known as Yu Chang. The southerners said that the KMT was using its state powers to implicate Tsai in the Yu Chang affair and that this was clearly a case of “bullying our Taiwanese women.”
Meanwhile, some women’s groups have united to form the “I Want a Female President Alliance,” with the aim of getting people to respect and pay more attention to women.
People all tend to focus on Tsai’s gender.
If I were in Tsai’s place, I definitely would not be happy to see voters concentrating on my gender, while ignoring my abilities. This single-minded perception of Tsai implies a “special attitude” toward women, not what one would expect from people with a mature grasp of democracy. Tsai would probably like to tell everyone: “Please, don’t make a big thing of my gender. Tsai Ing-wen is just Tsai Ing-wen, OK?”
Pai suggested that women are potential bringers of disaster. The sympathy that people from the south and civic groups have expressed for Tsai is based on the preconceived idea that women are the weaker sex and are therefore deserving of overbaked empathy and special treatment.
Both these views about women reflect traditional attitudes that value men and boys more highly than women and girls.
When this kind of attitude is applied to a presidential candidate, it can lead people to exaggerating a woman’s achievements. For instance, people say things like: “It’s really impressive that a woman could reach such a high position.” It can also lead people to hold a woman candidate in contempt and ignore her abilities. Pai’s remark is a typical example of the latter.
The result could be that Tsai wins votes because people sympathize with her as a “disadvantaged” candidate. Equally, if people get the idea that Tsai would attract disasters, she could lose votes because of silly prejudices.
If we judge a candidate on appearances only, how can we elect a leader who is really capable of taking the nation forward? To take gender as the basis for deciding whether or not a candidate is suitable as head of state is no less ridiculous than judging whether people are good or bad according to whether they are considered beautiful or ugly. It seems our society has still not shaken off the shackles of this kind of superficial mindset or escaped from traditional attitudes that underestimate women — at least not in our collective subconscious.
Could it be because most people are conditioned by traditional attitudes and constrained by appearances that elections in Taiwan cannot be conducted according to the ideas candidates put forward, how they perform in policy debates and what they have achieved in or out of government? Is that why candidates always try to win votes by dirty tricks designed to denigrate their opponents? No wonder the recent debate between KMT legislative candidate Chiu Yi (邱毅) and independent pan-green candidate Chen Chih-chung (陳致中) was so acrimonious, with both men using issues to do with women to sling mud at each other.
It looks as though candidates are not the only ones to blame for the fact that Taiwan’s electoral culture has got stuck in a rut and never seems to improve. Shouldn’t voters also take a long hard look at their own grasp of democratic principles?
Everyone these days is more or less agreed about equality of the sexes; so please, everyone, let’s just forget that Tsai happens to be a woman. Instead, let’s scrutinize her learning, knowledge and experience and then decide whether she is capable of taking Taiwan forward.
In other words, let’s judge Tsai in just the same way we judge Ma.
Hsu Yu-fang is associate professor and chairman of Sinophone literatures at National Dong Hua University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS