Humanity sinking further
What has our world come to?
In response to the admirable, although long overdue, banning of shark fin soup from the menus of the Peninsula Hotels group, a public relations officer at the Grand Formosa Regent Taipei, when asked why their hotel did not also ban shark fin soup, responded: “Our job is to meet the requirements of our clients” (“Hotels refuse to drop shark fin soup,” Nov. 27, page 1).
Translate that into: “Our job is to make money, no matter what. If clients wanted boiled children’s head soup, and it was legal, we would serve that, too. We have a complete absence of any moral values, because making money tops every other consideration in the world.”
In this, our corporate-sponsored world, greed now infests almost every aspect of economic and political action and it filters down to ordinary customers who don’t seem to mind gobbling down the last few remaining members of a species that has been living on this planet for much longer than we have, or to fight our fellow human beings tooth-and-nail over discounted bath towels (“Mass violence and pepper spray mar US’ ‘Black Friday,’” Nov. 27, page 1).
I am completely at a loss as to why humanity has sunken so low.
Is our only idea of progress the ever-increasing consumption of the Earth’s natural resources? What about enjoying and protecting beautiful things, such as landscapes and the plants and animals that live in them, or old, historic buildings, which seem to disappear even faster than sharks? What about spending time with family and friends instead of wasting our time in traffic jams and lineups just to get the newest iPhone?
And why do we even care about buying “things we don’t need with money we don’t have to impress people we don’t like,” to freely quote author Dave Ramsey (www.goodreads.com/quotes/show/25775)?
I am more and more convinced that real progress, which means making a better living for ourselves and all the other living creatures on this planet, actually stopped decades ago. What we see around us now is negative progress, because despite people having more money in their pockets, they behave worse, their societies are built around despicable greed and mindless consumption, and our Earth is getting more and more polluted and destroyed.
Unless we radically change our moral values and take care of each other and our fellow beings and spend our money on worthwhile things, I do not have much hope for humanity.
Flora Faun
Taipei
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS