US President Barack Obama, fresh from the APEC summit in Honolulu, flew to Canberra and Darwin in Australia and then to Bali, Indonesia, last week to confront China with an olive branch in one hand and a sword in the other.
In an address to the Australian parliament, Obama sought to assure China — and other Asian nations — that the US’ intent was peaceable.
“The United States will continue our effort to build a cooperative relationship with China,” he said, since all nations “have a profound interest in the rise of a peaceful and prosperous China.”
“We will seek more opportunities for cooperation with Beijing, including greater communication between our militaries to promote understanding and avoid miscalculation,” he added.
Obama has sought for months to persuade China’s leaders that the US is not trying to “contain” their nation’s spreading influence.
In Bali, at a gathering of political leaders from 18 Asia-Pacific nations, Obama reiterated that assurance, but was also vigorous in advocating maritime security, a code word for keeping open the international sea lanes through the South China Sea.
His stance drew nods of assent from most of the leaders assembled. Those sea lanes are vital to Asian economies because more shipping flows through them annually than uses the Suez and Panama canals combined.
The US has insisted on freedom of navigation through the South China Sea because US warships frequently sail though those waters between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Indeed, some US officers contend that whoever controls the South China Sea controls the rest of Asia.
In contrast, Chinese spokesmen said that Beijing had been “consistent and clear” in its position, having repeatedly asserted that China has “indisputable sovereignty” over the South China Sea.
Moreover, Beijing argues that disputes should be resolved through bilateral negotiations between China and other nations — enabling it to bring to bear its full power against weaker neighbors one by one.
However, the US has insisted that negotiations should include every nation with interests in the South China Sea, including Taiwan, the US, Japan and South Korea.
Obama, who met with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) at Wen’s request on the sidelines of the East Asia Summit, presumably reiterated the US position, even though the Chinese press said their conversation focused on economic issues. Wen also met with Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍).
However, even as he proffered an olive branch to China, Obama sought to add muscle to US security relations in the region. During a stop at a military base in Darwin, Australia, the president met with Australian soldiers and US marines.
“We are celebrating the 60th anniversary of our great alliance,” he said. “And we couldn’t think of a better group to do it with than you. All of you are the backbone of our alliance. It’s an honor to be here with Australia’s legendary Diggers. You are some of the toughest warriors in the world and so are another group of folks here today — our extraordinary United States marines.”
Accompanied by Gillard, he said: “Here in Darwin and northern Australia, we’ll write the next proud chapter in our alliance. As the prime minister and I announced yesterday, some of our marines will begin rotating through these parts to train and exercise with you, and to work as partners across the region for the security we all want.”
Later, in Bali, US officials disclosed that Washington would provide 24 refurbished F-16C/D jets to the Indonesian Air Force to patrol the southern shores of the South China Sea. In addition, the US would also provide 12 Black Hawk helicopters to Brunei. Those versatile aircraft can be used against pirates at sea.
Further, Obama conferred individually with leaders from Singapore, Malaysia and India. Before meeting with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, considered a current and future rival of China, Obama said he was pleased that India and the US could “work together on a wide range of issues, such as maritime security or nonproliferation.”
Obama also announced that he had asked US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to visit Myanmar next month to explore reconciliation between the US and the government there. Although US officials were cautious in briefing the press, it was clear that Washington was seeking to douse Chinese influence in a nation on its southern border.
Perhaps most importantly , Obama assured Asian leaders that he would see to it that the forthcoming budget cuts in Washington would not affect the US security posture in Asia, even as the defense budget takes its share of hits.
Richard Halloran is a commentator based in Hawaii.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS