US President Barack Obama, fresh from the APEC summit in Honolulu, flew to Canberra and Darwin in Australia and then to Bali, Indonesia, last week to confront China with an olive branch in one hand and a sword in the other.
In an address to the Australian parliament, Obama sought to assure China — and other Asian nations — that the US’ intent was peaceable.
“The United States will continue our effort to build a cooperative relationship with China,” he said, since all nations “have a profound interest in the rise of a peaceful and prosperous China.”
“We will seek more opportunities for cooperation with Beijing, including greater communication between our militaries to promote understanding and avoid miscalculation,” he added.
Obama has sought for months to persuade China’s leaders that the US is not trying to “contain” their nation’s spreading influence.
In Bali, at a gathering of political leaders from 18 Asia-Pacific nations, Obama reiterated that assurance, but was also vigorous in advocating maritime security, a code word for keeping open the international sea lanes through the South China Sea.
His stance drew nods of assent from most of the leaders assembled. Those sea lanes are vital to Asian economies because more shipping flows through them annually than uses the Suez and Panama canals combined.
The US has insisted on freedom of navigation through the South China Sea because US warships frequently sail though those waters between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Indeed, some US officers contend that whoever controls the South China Sea controls the rest of Asia.
In contrast, Chinese spokesmen said that Beijing had been “consistent and clear” in its position, having repeatedly asserted that China has “indisputable sovereignty” over the South China Sea.
Moreover, Beijing argues that disputes should be resolved through bilateral negotiations between China and other nations — enabling it to bring to bear its full power against weaker neighbors one by one.
However, the US has insisted that negotiations should include every nation with interests in the South China Sea, including Taiwan, the US, Japan and South Korea.
Obama, who met with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) at Wen’s request on the sidelines of the East Asia Summit, presumably reiterated the US position, even though the Chinese press said their conversation focused on economic issues. Wen also met with Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍).
However, even as he proffered an olive branch to China, Obama sought to add muscle to US security relations in the region. During a stop at a military base in Darwin, Australia, the president met with Australian soldiers and US marines.
“We are celebrating the 60th anniversary of our great alliance,” he said. “And we couldn’t think of a better group to do it with than you. All of you are the backbone of our alliance. It’s an honor to be here with Australia’s legendary Diggers. You are some of the toughest warriors in the world and so are another group of folks here today — our extraordinary United States marines.”
Accompanied by Gillard, he said: “Here in Darwin and northern Australia, we’ll write the next proud chapter in our alliance. As the prime minister and I announced yesterday, some of our marines will begin rotating through these parts to train and exercise with you, and to work as partners across the region for the security we all want.”
Later, in Bali, US officials disclosed that Washington would provide 24 refurbished F-16C/D jets to the Indonesian Air Force to patrol the southern shores of the South China Sea. In addition, the US would also provide 12 Black Hawk helicopters to Brunei. Those versatile aircraft can be used against pirates at sea.
Further, Obama conferred individually with leaders from Singapore, Malaysia and India. Before meeting with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, considered a current and future rival of China, Obama said he was pleased that India and the US could “work together on a wide range of issues, such as maritime security or nonproliferation.”
Obama also announced that he had asked US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to visit Myanmar next month to explore reconciliation between the US and the government there. Although US officials were cautious in briefing the press, it was clear that Washington was seeking to douse Chinese influence in a nation on its southern border.
Perhaps most importantly , Obama assured Asian leaders that he would see to it that the forthcoming budget cuts in Washington would not affect the US security posture in Asia, even as the defense budget takes its share of hits.
Richard Halloran is a commentator based in Hawaii.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS