During the previous presidential election campaign, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) accused the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of playing “dirty tricks.” They published a list of 16 such “tricks,” and even sent it to the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT).
However, the DPP is a bit cleaner than the KMT, and never used any of the tricks on the list. Ironically, four years later, the KMT has reached a dead-end, and has itself resorted to using the top tricks on that list.
The first trick on the list was “ethnic manipulation.” Because KMT leaders of Hakka descent are having problems holding on to their traditional supporters, they have resorted to labeling Hakka people who cannot speak the Hakka language as “false Hakka.” And formerly anti--communist military leaders, who used to rely on the loyal veteran vote, now say they will vote for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), a father of US citizens, even if it is with tears in their eyes.
The second trick was “underground gambling manipulation.” While this is not something the DPP would ever do, the KMT is well connected in this respect. Its “squeaky clean” presidential candidate has admitted to meeting with a big gambling bookmaker several times, but will not divulge what they talked about.
Ma won the 2008 election because voters were beguiled by the pretty packaging, and because former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had become a millstone around the DPP’s neck.
As Greater Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) said, the KMT’s strategy was to focus on attacking Chen and completely ignore the existence of then-DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷).
Having cheated the voters, the new government denied Taiwan’s sovereign status to the outside world. Domestically, the ghost of the party-state began stirring again as the judiciary and the legislature once again became the tools of dictatorship. Government waste and corruption increased, justice and fairness went out the window and any emotional connection to the general public was severed. Ma’s re-election bid no longer enjoys any advantages: Everyone can see through him, and his vice president has become a pariah in southern Taiwan.
Amid accusations of donations from the bookmaker, Ma’s re-election campaign is in shambles because he and his running mate have no political achievements to their name.
Pan-blue voters are already fed up with Ma. Asking for their support for another four years is an insult to their intelligence. Faced with this dreary prospect, then, it is not surprising that the KMT would resort to the same tricks it once accused its opponent of.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
RSS