The Ministry of Transportation and Communications, which is supposed to be in charge of traffic safety, although that seems to be left to chance in most places, recently made a few amendments to the Road Traffic Security Rules (道路交通安全規則).
The first one is that foreigners no longer have to reapply for a driver’s license every time their Alien Resident Certificates expire, returning to the old system that foreigners’ Taiwanese driver’s licenses will now be valid for six years, just like those for Taiwanese.
That’s a step in the right direction for the ministry, but what’s more important is enforcing that motorists have licenses in the first place. What’s to stop foreign motorists from just driving without a license, given that the police normally let them off with a warning or just wave them away without checking as soon as they realize they’ve pulled over a foreign national?
A second rule change is that motorists are no longer allowed to have multimedia devices running when their vehicles’ engines are turned on. Somebody at the ministry must have recently taken a taxi ride that made him or her realize how dangerous it is to drive and watch soap operas or ball games at the same time.
Again, this regulation isn’t going far enough. What’s to stop a driver from turning on small LED screens in or over their dashboard so that they have something to watch when stopped at one of the numerous 90-second traffic lights? Police are so busy directing traffic that they can’t be asked to pay attention to this detail. The new fine will likely make motorists a little more cautious about how they go about using multimedia devices, but it won’t stop the practice altogether.
The key, like with all traffic rules, is enforcement. If a rule is not enforced, few people will follow it, even if it is for their own good.
Talking on cellphones was banned more than a decade ago and enforcement was strict initially. Today, drivers can be seen attempting maneuvers that need at least two hands on the wheel while using one hand to hold their cellphones up to their ears. More MRT and bus commuters and pedestrians use earphones with their cellphones than motorists do.
Another example is the right of way given to pedestrians. At a crosswalk where a motorist has a green light and a pedestrian has a walk signal, the motorist is supposed to wait for the pedestrian to cross the road before turning right across his path. This is actually a law and a motorist can be fined if he doesn’t give people on foot the right of way.
However, outside the initial campaign launch years ago and periodic refreshers when there has been a particularly gruesome accident drawing widespread media attention, this law, like many other related laws, is rarely enforced. It’s not uncommon to see police standing idly by as a motorist steps on the gas to get to a crosswalk a split second earlier than someone on foot so he can get through the light first. All too frequently there are near misses or accidents because of drivers’ impatient attitudes and misplaced sense of entitlement.
Another example of rules not being enforced is when taxi drivers almost kill people on scooters to catch a fare who inconsiderately hails the taxi without regard to anybody else on the road. Rules and fines have been discussed to address this situation, but it seems that nothing will stop taxi drivers from recklessly pulling to the side of the streets from the far left lane unless they are forced to do so.
Changing regulations to relax rules or create fines for improper behavior is meaningless if there is no enforcement to back up the rules. Police are trying to address this, but they rely too heavily on speed cameras and spot checks, while ignoring reckless driving and selfish behavior. Until these are addressed, using Taiwan’s streets will always have that third-world feel of risking one’s life at every moment.
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that