Taiwan has a surface area of 36,000km2, on which 23 million people live. Difficult, perhaps, to imagine then that this modestly sized country incorporates two very different worlds. One is a world of leisure and enjoyment, the other a world of poverty and want.
Living in the first, one can enjoy a huge fireworks display to mark the centenary of the Republic of China (ROC) not so long after wandering around the Taipei International Flora Expo, and then from the fireworks display to the Dreamers (夢想家) extravaganza, and the inspirational, visual feast that was. And the cost? No need to worry about that. The NT$13.6 billion (US$449.67 million) spent on the expo, the NT$100 million up in smoke in one 20-minute fireworks show, the NT$215 million spent on four hours’ worth of performances spread over two nights for Dreamers, all came out of the public’s pocket. It was courtesy of the taxpayer. Were private individuals even asked to cough up?
Of course, influential people got VIP tickets sent off to them, promotional tickets, no problem. And of course, for the rest of us, with a bit of cash in our pockets and leisure time on our hands, we can get in for NT$300, maybe NT$500.
Then there is life in the world of want of the average farmers — banana, guava, garlic and pear farmers — who when not toiling under the hot summer sun, are plagued with constant concerns about falling prices and other risks.
Do they have the spare cash and time to pile into a car and drive to Taipei and catch the expo, or over to Greater Taichung to watch Dreamers? Can they take time out from their worries like those poor folk in the cities forced to take unpaid leave, or the jobless sitting at home, catching some respite from their woes by watching one of these shows?
Rather than allocating public resources and public funds to the hardworking majority or the more vulnerable groups in society, this money is being spent instead on entertaining people with money and leisure time on their hands, giving them more and more marvelous ways to dispose of both. Really, what is the world coming to?
Actually, if the wider public exists in two worlds in Taiwan, the phenomenon is perhaps even more pronounced in the art world. The general consensus, perhaps a stereotype, but often true, is of the poverty-ridden artist, living hand-to-mouth. Perhaps their lot comes from some original sin, but their lot it is, and they just have to grin and bear what is coming to them.
Anyway, the very fact of their poverty spurs them on and inspires their work. Their circumstance is both the sustenance and the source of their art. And, being artists, they would never stoop so low as to whine about this. No, the reality is actually quite different, surprisingly enough, and the art world is just as polarized as the rest of society.
There are also the Yo-yo Mas (馬友友) of this world, which is how you can get a production like Dreamers commanding NT$39 million for the “creativity design project” and NT$60.79 million for “production and performance planning;” NT$550 million for director Stan Lai’s (賴聲川) input in the opening and closing ceremonies of the Summer Deaflympics in Taipei in September 2009 and another NT$150 million for Ismene Ting (丁乃箏), an actress and director who happens to be Lai’s sister-in-law, to work on the flora expo.
The government is throwing money at these things. Whoever said there is no money in art? And whatever happened to the idea of poor tortured souls starving for their art?
From the above figures, it seems all too obvious that there is no shortage of funds in the art world; it literally seems to have money to burn.
The problem with the art world today is not a lack of cash, it is a lack of an even playing field; it is not a problem of talent or fair competition, it is a problem of monopolizing resources, of nepotism and inbreeding; it is not a problem of art for art’s sake, it is a problem of art for politics’ sake.
Any mention of the money pits of the Deaflympics, the flora expo or Dreamers leads one to Lai and his circle. Any talk of the string of fireworks displays and Taiwanese operas leads you straight to Chinese artist Cai Guoqiang (蔡國強) and the Ming Hwa Yuan (Tien) Taiwanese Opera Company (明華園天字戲劇團).
These Yo-yo Mas are all associated with “being creative,” and “being creative” is associated with NT dollars measured in the tens of millions, the hundreds of millions. That is how the money is spent.
For the vast majority of artists who live below the stratospheric heights of Ma and his ilk, well, sorry, if you go and ask for public funds and get told where to go; you have only yourselves to blame. You can ask, and shall not receive. Is this the art world you know?
Taiwan, how did it come to this? Who allowed things to get this bad?
Chang Kuo-tsai retired from National Hsinchu University of Education as an associate professor.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
A retired elementary-school teacher surnamed Lai (賴) said that, after retiring at the age of 50, he earned a monthly pension of over NT$60,000. Since retirement, he has earned over NT$10 million (US$306,457). If the government does not allocate more funding, the pension funds would soon go bankrupt. There is an urgent need for reform. If his monthly pension were lowered to NT$50,000, it would still be enough to cover basic life expenses, he said. In response, Taipei School Education Union president Lee Hui-lan (李惠蘭) said to Lai: “What do you mean by using your own pension as an example?”
RSS