The Japanese media recently quoted President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) as saying he was not opposed to discussing a political agreement about unification or a peace agreement with China. The day after that quote appeared in the Japanese press, the presidential office criticized the report, saying it was subjective and prejudiced. With those words still ringing in our ears, Ma then announced that Taiwan would negotiate a peace agreement with China within the next 10 years.
This issue is extremely important to Taiwanese and the future of the nation, and as such a national consensus needs to be achieved to ensure any proposal has the legitimacy it needs before a formal announcement. It is therefore very worrying to see Ma’s slipshod and rushed approach to the issue.
According to former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and current Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), any so-called peace agreement with Taiwan would seek to end the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and return Taiwan to “the motherland.” This is not what Ma means when he talks about a mechanism to prevent war between the two nations.
In 1951, Tibet was forced to sign the “Agreement of the Central People’s Government and the Local Government of Tibet on Measures for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet” under threat of war. After the agreement was signed, the People’s Liberation Army continued massacring Tibetans, revealing the agreement to be a useless piece of paper.
A peace accord that prevents war touches on many complex issues, including the status of the parties to the agreement, the establishment of a framework for peace, the planning of the peace process, how to execute the agreement, international monitoring, a restructuring of national defense, as well as international arbitration. Every step of this process would be difficult.
Considering how China has behaved toward Taiwan, it is difficult to argue that the environment will be conducive to the signing of a peace agreement any time soon.
First, would it be possible for Taiwan to sign an agreement with the “Central People’s Government” as the “Local Government of Taiwan”? If we cannot even agree on the title of the document, how can we expect to agree on anything else?
Any peace agreement that fails to prevent war, even if it is wrapped in a pretty package, is nothing more than a unification agreement in disguise. A peace agreement ending a civil war between the CCP and the KMT, or a peace agreement similar to the one signed by Tibet, is essentially an agreement for Taiwan to return to the so-called “motherland.” Ma simply prefers to dress up this transitional arrangement in an inoffensive way.
Furthermore, Beijing defines cross-strait issues as domestic affairs because it wants to eliminate international interference, particularly the international peace and safety mechanisms included in the UN Charter. There are currently no regional security institutions that could ensure the validity of such an agreement, nor is there a joint bilateral defense system. The only safety net would be the US’ Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) and the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the US and Japan — the latter applying to areas around Japan, including the Taiwan Strait.
Any cross-strait peace agreement would not only fail to guarantee Taiwan’s security, it would also give China an excuse to demand that the US discontinue arms sales to Taiwan.
Ma’s proposal is ambiguous and irresponsible. If he is not the idiot here, then we are certainly the fools.
Chen Rong-jye is a professor of law and a former secretary-general of the Straits Exchange Foundation.
Translated by Kyle Jeffcoat
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS