While the Jasmine Revolution that swept the Arab world at the beginning of this year, the protests in Israel over high housing costs and the street protests in London do not seem to be connected geopolitically or in terms of their demands, the current Occupy Wall Street protest has finally outlined the deep-seated political and economic background factors that these issues all share.
The harm to local economic life in many countries and to the current age in general caused by the dominance of economic globalization over the past 20 years can no longer be covered up. This is only the prelude to the real social backlash.
The globalized economy operates on the principle of benefiting a small group of “winners,” while hurting the other 99 percent of society who make up the “losers.” The idea of the globalized economy is based on hypnotizing people into believing how great globalization and the knowledge-based economy are and making them believe they will be losers if they do not join it.
People who have joined the party too late to become part of the group of winners should do everything they can to ensure their children get into a good school and gain a head start in the race to join the group.
The education system should follow the principle that the user pays in order to maintain efficiency. So the younger generation who have accepted the value and logic of globalization and have worked hard to get into limited places at university, taking on heavy student loans in the process, often find after graduating they are either unable to find a job or they get a job that merely keeps them one of the working poor with just enough money to get by. For these people, buying a house and having children are simply out of the question.
However, poverty alone will not necessarily meet the criteria necessary to set off a revolution. Those who have a hard time making a living often blame themselves for not trying hard enough, but on closer inspection, they will see that the real reason for their hardship is that government policy is slanted in favor of corporations and the rich. They will also see that blindly believing in the free market results in a lack of freedom for 99 percent of people. This will anger some of them, who will begin to link up with each other using new forms of communication.
Under such circumstances, there is no need for leaders, a political party or clear goals. All that is necessary is for the movement to strike a resonance deep within our hearts and this will cause people will to move away from Facebook, where they have no real identity, and join together at protests to fight injustice as a united group.
Such examples do not only include the Jasmine Revolution and Wall Street — the protests in Jhunan Township’s (竹南) Dapu Village (大埔), Miaoli County, that occurred last year also clearly demonstrate how such movements are started in the Internet age. They not only transcend nations; they also transcend party politics and are directed straight at the core of social justice.
C.J. Wu is a researcher at the Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
In September 2015, Russia intervened militarily in Syria’s civil war, propping up Bashar al-Assad’s dictatorship as it teetered on the brink of collapse. This was the high point of Russia’s resurgence on the world stage and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ability to tilt the war in al-Assad’s favor helped make him a regional power broker. In addition to enhancing Putin’s stature, the operation led to strategic gains that gave Russia leverage vis-a-vis regional and Western powers. Syria was thus a status symbol for the Kremlin. Putin, who sees Russia as a great power on par with the US and China, attaches
With Washington substantially off-guard in power transition, China’s supreme leader, Xi Jinping (習近平), is intensifying an anti-corruption campaign against the top military leadership. At a glance, the move seems to be consistent with his emphasis on the necessity of enhancing military preparedness for a possible full military invasion of Taiwan, because the military is required to be well-disciplined without corruption. Looking carefully, however, a series of purges of several top military leaders since last year begs the question of what dynamics has worked behind the anomaly. More specifically, general Wei Fenghe (魏鳳和) and his immediate successor, Li Shangfu (李尚福), were removed as People’s
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
RSS