There are those who are great fans of Apple Inc and appreciate its creativity in product design. There are also those who are critical of the company, complaining about its products’ closed architecture and their not-so-cheap price tags.
However, the sad news of the death of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs on Wednesday has prompted many of his fans and critics, as well as partners and rivals, to reflect on his legacy as an innovator, a trendsetter and a successful entrepreneur.
Regardless of whether one is a critic or a fan, Jobs’ contribution to the world is remarkable. The impact he has had on the rise in popularity of information and communications technology (ICT) products, from personal computers and music players to smartphones and tablet devices, has helped to shape the world.
While paying tribute to this high-tech visionary, we in Taiwan should also reflect on the impact the late Apple founder has had on this country and Asia as a whole, given that the Apple supply chain has had growing social and economic implications in recent years.
Acer Inc founder Stan Shih (施振榮) said in a statement on Thursday that under Jobs’ leadership, Apple created new business opportunities for Taiwan’s ICT industry. Like it or not, the Apple business model has seen more relevant parties share a common interest in an ever-expanding array of ICT products and applications, Shih said.
Shih was correct. In more than a decade, Apple has established a formidable supply chain in Taiwan through which it can manufacture its products, with its local contract manufacturers and component suppliers hiring tens of thousands of workers to help make Apple the most valuable company in the US.
Taiwan’s Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, for instance, is one of the best-known Apple contractors in Asia and also one of the largest employers in China. Some previously little-known companies such as touch-screen maker TPK Holding Co have also seen their fortunes expand quickly as they became key players in the sector through partnerships with Apple.
However, what Shih and other mourners did not say is that while many of those contract manufacturers and component suppliers may be good at doing business with Apple, they have become increasingly dependent on the US company for continued orders and are likely to encounter margin pressure in the face of Apple’s demand for lower prices.
The challenge for many companies working in the Apple supply chain is that while they may have achieved efficient manufacturing in line with their scale, their profit margin is relatively small compared with Apple’s sales of its own branded products. At a time when companies in Taiwan are expressing their condolences over Jobs’ passing, they may also have to think: If their ties with Apple grow stronger, will they be able to escape this perennial low-margin fate?
In a country where we enjoy the benefits of a democratic political system and free-market environment, and where people respect a pluralistic culture and technological innovation, Taiwan should encourage more companies to move up the global corporate ladder. Brand building is the name of the game — smartphone maker HTC Corp last week jumped into the list of the world’s top 100 brands at No. 98, the first time a Taiwanese company has made it onto the list.
Taiwan needs to grow more companies like Apple. Perhaps the greatest legacy Jobs has left us is inspiration to move up the production ladder.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS