If evidence was needed of how poorly Taiwan’s legislature works, Wednesday’s legislative review and approval of Executive Yuan-nominated Central Election Commission (CEC) members would be a good place to start.
On the surface, the review process appears to be a good idea. The Executive Yuan nominates CEC members based on experience, political acumen and character, and a panel of legislators led by a committee chairperson reviews the nominees before deciding whether they should be appointed.
Granting permission for somebody to become a CEC member is an important decision, because these people have power over Taiwanese elections and could essentially shape Taiwanese democracy.
In the review process, lawmakers are meant to grill candidates on their political views, their character and their ethics. If they are unsuitable and, for example, hold an allegiance to any particular political party or harbor authoritarian views, they should be rejected outright. This needs to be established in the review.
Wednesday’s review went nothing like that. Instead, it was a farce on the level of political satire. The writers of Everyone Talks Nonsense (全民大悶鍋) couldn’t have thought up a better script.
The review process had barely started when Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Huang Jen-shu (黃仁杼) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Pan Wei-kang (潘維剛) noticed that one of the nominees was missing. Apparently, incumbent CEC member Chai Song-lin (柴松林), who was up for review, did not show up because he was, in fact, overseas. This angered legislators across party lines, but they could not agree on whether to postpone the review or keep going, so KMT Legislator Huang Chao-shun (黃昭順), who was convening the meeting, called a 10-minute break for negotiations.
Huang Chao-shun then disappeared and didn’t return for 50 minutes. After offering an absurd excuse for her extended absence, she reconvened the meeting. However, when DPP legislators protested, she called another recess, which lasted until lunchtime. By that time, the DPP legislators had quit the review in frustration, but that didn’t stop the meeting reconvening after lunch, with the remaining KMT legislators approving all five CEC nominees, even the absent Chai.
Three of the nominees were incumbents, while the other two were picked by an Executive Yuan under Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) that shows little neutrality in political matters. Those incumbents were responsible for the CEC blocking multiple requests by the DPP and the Taiwan Solidarity Union to put the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) to a referendum. Without the referendum, Taiwan’s public had no say over a cross-strait agreement that is paving the way to economic unification.
The same CEC had also decided to move next year’s presidential election forward two months, which would give President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) if he is voted out, four months to meddle in state affairs before having to vacate the Presidential Office.
To all intents and purposes, the CEC appears loyal to the Ma administration. Furthermore, it seems willing to bend the rules to rig the game in Ma’s favor. The legislative review committee is the last bastion of hope for public officials to fix this situation.
That is why it is so disappointing to see CEC officials take up their positions without even having to answer basic questions about their character, mainly because KMT and DPP legislators can’t agree on anything, even what to do when political nominees disrespect the legislature.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS