China has grown fabulously wealthy over the past 30 years, and especially the past decade. In the same period, the West has gone through a seemingly constant cycle of boom and bust, followed by the deep “recession” that set in a couple of years ago and shows no sign of ending any time soon.
How did China grow so wealthy while the West was hollowed out? The simple answer is by manufacturing all the junk the West can’t live without, at a cheaper price than anybody else. To buy China’s junk, which is now increasingly supplemented by high-quality, high-technology products, Western countries had to buy the Chinese yuan with their own currencies to facilitate international trade. Because China’s currency is not freely convertible, most of that foreign currency — the lion’s share of which, coming from the world’s biggest consumer, was US dollars — wound up in China, where officials had to decide what to do with the mountains of cash they were accumulating.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union — and just before the US decided it was going to be the world’s only superpower — one Chinese official must have had a bright idea: “Aiya! We can buy US bonds [debt].”
China then bankrolled the largest growth spurt in US history, while the US dug itself into the deepest hole any would-be empire has ever gotten itself into. About 20 years later, and after a decade of war, the creditor is coming back to bite the US in the rear.
China now has unprecedented political “influence” over the US. It is not complete, of course, but when you see US officials kowtowing every time Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) shows up — US President Barack Obama bowed pretty deeply to Hu when he visited Washington — and begging China to not drop US bonds — something US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton did after Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) questioned the safety of the US dollar — it gives you an idea of just how far the US is willing to bend over for China.
Like Bobby Fischer, China played an exquisite game of chess — and the US lost, even though China was by far the weaker of the two just three decades ago.
This strategy worked so successfully with the US that China is now looking to do the same thing with Europe. At least, that was the message Wen was sending on Wednesday when he told the World Economic Forum that China would ramp up investments in Europe despite the recent flight of capital from the eurozone by investors who are increasingly pessimistic about the future.
China looks set to buy Europe on the cheap. First Greece, Portugal and Spain; then Italy, and who knows who will be next.
Chinese officials did not help the US out of the kindness of their hearts, and their interest in the eurozone is anything but philanthropic. Beijing has already hinted that it would very much like the EU to give China “full market-economy status” in the near future, despite most of China’s largest companies being state-run, if it is to pour money into Europe and thus save the euro — quid pro quo.
That makes it two for China and zero for the rest of the world.
A few more years of this, and we should not be surprised to see China as the newest member of the EU — which would probably be a lot better for the rest of Europe than inviting in Croatia.
Meanwhile, the US might, as Bolivian President Evo Morales once said, find itself increasingly resembling a Chinese colony.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS