Where’s the justice?
Recent court decisions about former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Diane Lee (李慶安) and the state affairs fund case of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) are very confusing and hard for the general public to understand. Lee, a former Taipei City councilor before she became a KMT legislator, who was given a two-year prison sentence after she was convicted of concealing her dual US citizenship and fraudulently receiving a salary of up to NT$100 million (US$3.1 million) was given a non-guilty verdict on appeal.
Chen, on the other hand, had his guilty verdict in the Longtan, Nangang Exhibition Hall, the state affairs fund and other cases upheld by the court and must remain in prison. How are we to teach our children what justice is with these rulings, which are obviously destroying justice? Why was Chen found guilty while Lee was found innocent and President Ma Ying-jeou(馬英九) was not even indicted on similar charges?
Judicial decisions that seem to be targeted at specific people are not acceptable.
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently said “I am Taiwanese,” Ma’s people said her statement was differentiating between ethnic groups.
However, the real differentiation between ethnic groups was to convict Chen and lock him up. How can this kind of standard convince Taiwanese?
Former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his wife, Madame Chiang (Soong Mayling, 宋美齡) had their food, clothing and housing paid for by Taiwanese taxpayers, but they still implemented the martial law era, killed innocent people, and created the White Terror era in Taiwan. Why doesn’t the Judicial Yuan carry out justice and pursue investigations into their cases?
These judicial decisions shows us what is going on behind the scenes in Taiwan. No wonder Hsu Shui-teh (許水德), a former secretary-general of the KMT, said that the courts are run by the KMT. Even if the courts are not completely run by the KMT, the party can at least be considered a “substantial shareholder” in Taiwan’s judicial system. The KMT can control every judicial decision.
During the Chinese imperial days, all national power was concentrated in the hands of the emperor. Even a three-year-old child could become emperor during the Qing dynasty. Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) then called on China’s young people to overthrow the autocratic Qing dynasty in the hope of building a democratic country. Unfortunately, to this day, the KMT still follows the same imperial thinking and culture.
Today, Taiwan calls itself a democracy, but it still isn’t possible to reach fair judicial decisions. It is easy for a judge to serve as a tool for the ruling party and follow the principle that the courts should “only sentence members of the pan-green camp and not members of the pan-blue camp.”
I would like to ask Ma about his views on this issue. What can Tsai, the DPP’s presidential candidate, do about this issue?
In order to safeguard the people of Taiwan and give them a peaceful life with dignity and human rights, please promptly release former president Chen. This is the wish of a humble Taiwanese.
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA
Taipei
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS