Where’s the justice?
Recent court decisions about former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Diane Lee (李慶安) and the state affairs fund case of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) are very confusing and hard for the general public to understand. Lee, a former Taipei City councilor before she became a KMT legislator, who was given a two-year prison sentence after she was convicted of concealing her dual US citizenship and fraudulently receiving a salary of up to NT$100 million (US$3.1 million) was given a non-guilty verdict on appeal.
Chen, on the other hand, had his guilty verdict in the Longtan, Nangang Exhibition Hall, the state affairs fund and other cases upheld by the court and must remain in prison. How are we to teach our children what justice is with these rulings, which are obviously destroying justice? Why was Chen found guilty while Lee was found innocent and President Ma Ying-jeou(馬英九) was not even indicted on similar charges?
Judicial decisions that seem to be targeted at specific people are not acceptable.
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) recently said “I am Taiwanese,” Ma’s people said her statement was differentiating between ethnic groups.
However, the real differentiation between ethnic groups was to convict Chen and lock him up. How can this kind of standard convince Taiwanese?
Former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his wife, Madame Chiang (Soong Mayling, 宋美齡) had their food, clothing and housing paid for by Taiwanese taxpayers, but they still implemented the martial law era, killed innocent people, and created the White Terror era in Taiwan. Why doesn’t the Judicial Yuan carry out justice and pursue investigations into their cases?
These judicial decisions shows us what is going on behind the scenes in Taiwan. No wonder Hsu Shui-teh (許水德), a former secretary-general of the KMT, said that the courts are run by the KMT. Even if the courts are not completely run by the KMT, the party can at least be considered a “substantial shareholder” in Taiwan’s judicial system. The KMT can control every judicial decision.
During the Chinese imperial days, all national power was concentrated in the hands of the emperor. Even a three-year-old child could become emperor during the Qing dynasty. Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) then called on China’s young people to overthrow the autocratic Qing dynasty in the hope of building a democratic country. Unfortunately, to this day, the KMT still follows the same imperial thinking and culture.
Today, Taiwan calls itself a democracy, but it still isn’t possible to reach fair judicial decisions. It is easy for a judge to serve as a tool for the ruling party and follow the principle that the courts should “only sentence members of the pan-green camp and not members of the pan-blue camp.”
I would like to ask Ma about his views on this issue. What can Tsai, the DPP’s presidential candidate, do about this issue?
In order to safeguard the people of Taiwan and give them a peaceful life with dignity and human rights, please promptly release former president Chen. This is the wish of a humble Taiwanese.
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA
Taipei
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
A retired elementary-school teacher surnamed Lai (賴) said that, after retiring at the age of 50, he earned a monthly pension of over NT$60,000. Since retirement, he has earned over NT$10 million (US$306,457). If the government does not allocate more funding, the pension funds would soon go bankrupt. There is an urgent need for reform. If his monthly pension were lowered to NT$50,000, it would still be enough to cover basic life expenses, he said. In response, Taipei School Education Union president Lee Hui-lan (李惠蘭) said to Lai: “What do you mean by using your own pension as an example?”
RSS