On Aug. 23, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) announced the party’s new national security strategy as part of her campaign for January’s presidential election. The document takes a refreshing look at the situation, establishes core principles as a point of departure and lays out a set of clear policy positions.
The strength of the policy paper is that it positions Taiwan as a member of the international community that “has the duty to actively participate in and contribute to international cooperative efforts, and do its best to fulfill its responsibilities as a member of the international community.”
In the paper, the DPP advocates a “balanced global strategy” in which Taiwan reinforces its strategic partnership with the US and strengthens cooperation with other countries in the Asia-Pacific region.
Relations with China are dealt with extensively: Tsai advocates “multi-layered and multifaceted exchanges” between Taiwan and China, which would result in a framework for “cross-strait peace and interaction,” thereby establishing a “stable and constructive bilateral relationship.”
This approach presents a much better prospect for Taiwan’s future than the worn-out approach of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, which bases itself on the archaic “Republic of China” Constitution that originated in 1947 Nanjing and has very little to do with present-day Taiwan. It would be akin to applying Britain’s unwritten constitution to the US because at one point in time the English king ruled over the 13 American colonies.
The other misnomer in the policies of the Ma administration is the so-called “1992 consensus,” a vague and confused definition of “one China” whereby the two sides are supposed to have different interpretations.
Tsai said that it would be much better if the Taiwanese arrived at a “Taiwan consensus” based on a common Taiwanese identity and shared values such as an adherence to the universal principles of justice and democracy, balanced external relations and human rights, because this would provide a more solid base for future dialogue with China.
The Taiwanese have a choice: Are they going to find their Taiwanese roots as a seafaring nation and become an integral part of the global community of nations, or will they continue to follow the anachronistic Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) line and thereby ensure their future is dependent on the goodwill of authoritarian China? The January elections will reveal all.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS