Nothing causes greater discord in Sino-US relations than the status of Taiwan, officially known as the Republic of China. However, the best way to maintain peace between Washington and Beijing may be for the US to continue selling weapons to Taiwan. Once ruled by Imperial China — but never Communist China — the Taiwanese have created a vibrant democracy. Yet their small nation risks being crushed by Bejing’s embrace.
During the Cold War, the two Chinas were bitterly at odds. As the People’s Republic of China (PRC) grew economically and moderated politically, it surged past Taipei on the international stage. Today the PRC is determined to reassert control over what it views as a renegade province.
Washington has promised to sell Taiwan weapons for its defense. Last year, the US announced a US$6.4 billion arms package. The Sino-US relationship will likely be the world’s most important bilateral connection this century. The two nations are tightly linked economically and they share many other interests — stability in East Asia, freedom of the seas, an open global economy and cooperative international institutions. Perhaps the most important objective for the existing superpower and the potential superpower is to avoid conflict. The PRC has demonstrated little interest in overseas military expansion or attacking the US. Economic competition between the two is growing in Asia, Africa and even South America, but Washington’s best response would be to liberalize the US economy, not deploy the US navy.
However, a clash is possible in East Asia. Today, the US dominates the region, even along China’s border, but the PRC is building deterrent forces, particularly missiles and submarines capable of sinking US aircraft carriers. The PRC poses no threat to the US homeland. However, Beijing doesn’t want the US to be able to threaten its homeland. Imagine if the Chinese navy were patrolling coasts right off the US, prepared to intervene in, say, Washington’s struggle with Hawaiian secessionists.
Since it is far cheaper to build defensive than offensive weapons, the US could bankrupt itself buying additional platforms to maintain its ability to attack China. Nevertheless, Washington should not abandon Taiwan. The nation is entitled to decide its own destiny. Certainly Beijing is not justified in attempting to coerce the Taiwanese people.
The best solution would be a negotiated settlement. The two states and peoples have drawn steadily closer. However, the PRC will make itself politically attractive only when it accepts a free society and a liberalized economy.
In the meantime, the US should authorize arms sales that enable Taiwan to maintain a military deterrent just as China is building a deterrent to the US. Taipei should not “try to match the PRC ship for ship, plane for plane, or missile for missile,” the Washington-based Taiwan Policy Working Group has said. Rather, Taipei should build a small, but deadly force capable of exacting a high price from any attackers.
Last year’s weapons package included Harpoon and Patriot missiles, mine-detection ships, Blackhawk helicopters and communications equipment. Washington put off any decision on advanced F-16s and diesel-electric submarines, but Taiwan is now pressing for the fighters.
The administration of US President Barack Obama has reportedly decided to refuse to supply the most advanced aircraft because China might retaliate diplomatically. However, empowering Taiwan is worth risking tense relations with the PRC. After all, arms sales do not put the US and China closer to a path to war. Rather, they create a disincentive for Beijing to consider war as an option.
That’s why a reasonable accommodation between China and Taiwan is more likely if Taipei possesses the ability to defend itself. Taiwanese officials repeatedly made this point on my recent visit to the nation.
Vice Minister of National Defense Andrew Yang (楊念祖) said the objective was to create a force that tells China: “Don’t mess with us, for you will pay a big price if you do.”
Ambassador Stephen Chen (陳錫蕃), now at the National Policy Foundation, said that better aircraft would increase Taiwan’s bargaining power: “When we enter into political negotiations with the mainland, we need to go into negotiations from a position of strength.”
Of course, Taipei should not be purely reliant on the US. Taiwan recently deployed its third generation of Brave Wind anti-ship missiles. Taipei is also considering production of the Hsiung Feng-2E ballistic missile. Even a small strategic deterrent would force the PRC to hesitate before threatening Taiwan.
Washington should help Taipei defend itself. Peace is in the interest of Taiwan, China and the US. Washington should maintain a good relationship with the PRC, but continue arms sales to Taipei to preserve stability and peace across the Taiwan Strait.
Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and a former special assistant to former US president Ronald Reagan.
US president-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday named US Representative Mike Waltz, a vocal supporter of arms sales to Taiwan who has called China an “existential threat,” as his national security advisor, and on Thursday named US Senator Marco Rubio, founding member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China — a global, cross-party alliance to address the challenges that China poses to the rules-based order — as his secretary of state. Trump’s appointments, including US Representative Elise Stefanik as US ambassador to the UN, who has been a strong supporter of Taiwan in the US Congress, and Robert Lighthizer as US trade
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
RSS