Nothing causes greater discord in Sino-US relations than the status of Taiwan, officially known as the Republic of China. However, the best way to maintain peace between Washington and Beijing may be for the US to continue selling weapons to Taiwan. Once ruled by Imperial China — but never Communist China — the Taiwanese have created a vibrant democracy. Yet their small nation risks being crushed by Bejing’s embrace.
During the Cold War, the two Chinas were bitterly at odds. As the People’s Republic of China (PRC) grew economically and moderated politically, it surged past Taipei on the international stage. Today the PRC is determined to reassert control over what it views as a renegade province.
Washington has promised to sell Taiwan weapons for its defense. Last year, the US announced a US$6.4 billion arms package. The Sino-US relationship will likely be the world’s most important bilateral connection this century. The two nations are tightly linked economically and they share many other interests — stability in East Asia, freedom of the seas, an open global economy and cooperative international institutions. Perhaps the most important objective for the existing superpower and the potential superpower is to avoid conflict. The PRC has demonstrated little interest in overseas military expansion or attacking the US. Economic competition between the two is growing in Asia, Africa and even South America, but Washington’s best response would be to liberalize the US economy, not deploy the US navy.
However, a clash is possible in East Asia. Today, the US dominates the region, even along China’s border, but the PRC is building deterrent forces, particularly missiles and submarines capable of sinking US aircraft carriers. The PRC poses no threat to the US homeland. However, Beijing doesn’t want the US to be able to threaten its homeland. Imagine if the Chinese navy were patrolling coasts right off the US, prepared to intervene in, say, Washington’s struggle with Hawaiian secessionists.
Since it is far cheaper to build defensive than offensive weapons, the US could bankrupt itself buying additional platforms to maintain its ability to attack China. Nevertheless, Washington should not abandon Taiwan. The nation is entitled to decide its own destiny. Certainly Beijing is not justified in attempting to coerce the Taiwanese people.
The best solution would be a negotiated settlement. The two states and peoples have drawn steadily closer. However, the PRC will make itself politically attractive only when it accepts a free society and a liberalized economy.
In the meantime, the US should authorize arms sales that enable Taiwan to maintain a military deterrent just as China is building a deterrent to the US. Taipei should not “try to match the PRC ship for ship, plane for plane, or missile for missile,” the Washington-based Taiwan Policy Working Group has said. Rather, Taipei should build a small, but deadly force capable of exacting a high price from any attackers.
Last year’s weapons package included Harpoon and Patriot missiles, mine-detection ships, Blackhawk helicopters and communications equipment. Washington put off any decision on advanced F-16s and diesel-electric submarines, but Taiwan is now pressing for the fighters.
The administration of US President Barack Obama has reportedly decided to refuse to supply the most advanced aircraft because China might retaliate diplomatically. However, empowering Taiwan is worth risking tense relations with the PRC. After all, arms sales do not put the US and China closer to a path to war. Rather, they create a disincentive for Beijing to consider war as an option.
That’s why a reasonable accommodation between China and Taiwan is more likely if Taipei possesses the ability to defend itself. Taiwanese officials repeatedly made this point on my recent visit to the nation.
Vice Minister of National Defense Andrew Yang (楊念祖) said the objective was to create a force that tells China: “Don’t mess with us, for you will pay a big price if you do.”
Ambassador Stephen Chen (陳錫蕃), now at the National Policy Foundation, said that better aircraft would increase Taiwan’s bargaining power: “When we enter into political negotiations with the mainland, we need to go into negotiations from a position of strength.”
Of course, Taipei should not be purely reliant on the US. Taiwan recently deployed its third generation of Brave Wind anti-ship missiles. Taipei is also considering production of the Hsiung Feng-2E ballistic missile. Even a small strategic deterrent would force the PRC to hesitate before threatening Taiwan.
Washington should help Taipei defend itself. Peace is in the interest of Taiwan, China and the US. Washington should maintain a good relationship with the PRC, but continue arms sales to Taipei to preserve stability and peace across the Taiwan Strait.
Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and a former special assistant to former US president Ronald Reagan.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS