Being an independent state
Some people have recently proclaimed: “Taiwan and China, one side, one state.” My mind responded that this “China” should be the “Republic of China” (ROC), not the “People’s Republic of China” (PRC).
Shigeru Oda, an authority in international law, published the thesis A Sovereign Independent Country, Taiwan — Taiwan’s Status Within International Law in 2006. He concluded: “Taiwan was not part of the PRC in the past. Taiwan is not part of the PRC now either.”
He also said “Taiwan’s independence” should never have to be separated from that of the PRC.
The concept of separating Taiwan from the PRC should never have existed.
Needless to say, the so-called “Taiwan independence” movement of the past half-century should have meant “Taiwanese independent from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-ROC.”
It has never had anything to do with the PRC regime in Beijing. His view is identical with that of my late husband, C.C. Yang (楊基銓).
The Liberty Times published an article by my husband on July 26, 1998, titled “The sovereignty of Taiwan independence and the ROC,” in which he wrote that the only way to reach the real sovereignty of Taiwanese independence, to break away from China’s entanglement and to ensure Taiwan’s security, was to draw a line between Taiwan and the ROC. We need to make a clear division between Taiwan and the ROC.
I believe that before China’s reunification issue is resolved, the ROC government should move to Kinmen and Matsu to act as truly “Taiwan and China, one side, one state.” After that, Taiwan will not have any connection with the ROC.
We all have a sense of crisis about Taiwan’s future. Therefore, we always say: “Let’s fight to win.”
However, this sentence is not very practical, it’s just like the popular saying, “To use a fist to crack the stone lion.” The result is that while the stone lion is cracked, your fists are injured. Your hands might even be so badly damaged as to become unusable.
We need to use a machine to process this stone lion job. We need to use wisdom, and not be swayed by personal feelings. I sincerely hope to gather like-minded people together to study the possible strategies.
International treaties and historical facts indicate that the sovereignty of Taiwan and Penghu was not vested under the ROC government. It is a right of Taiwanese to establish their own country.
When you use bulldozers, high-rise buildings can be crushed to the ground in a short time. In the market I frequently hear statements like: “Incompetent government that cannot take good care of its people, let’s pull it down now!”
However, the best policy is to use wisdom with the “bulldozers” to overturn the long-ruling KMT.
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA (楊劉秀華)
Taipei
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS