I received a phone call on Tuesday telling me that another fire had occurred at Formosa Plastics Corp’s sixth naphtha cracker complex. News tickers on TV stations mentioned the fire while I thought about the people who reside along the coast in Mailiao (麥寮) and Taisi (台西) townships and how they would have had trouble sleeping the night before. Unfortunately, for residents of these areas, this has been a constant nightmare ever since industrial accidents of all sizes started to occur last year.
After a fire broke out in the pipes at the complex on May 12 and the Yunlin County government was forced to suspend operations at the plant, Forumosa Plastics has constantly reiterated how hard it is trying to improve industrial safety. In addition, because repeated suspensions of operations have caused upstream and downstream businesses to incur losses, it has been trying to get the time it can resume operations moved forward. On July 11, Yunlin County Government’s Economic Affairs Department approved Nan Ya Plastics Corp’s application to resume operations at its second and third factories at the Haifeng (海豐) compound in Mailiao. During recent examination meetings, there were also signs that other parts of operations that have been suspended will be allowed to resume soon. However, a fire has started yet again.
The majority of people who live along Yunlin County’s coastal townships near the sixth naphtha cracker complex do not know what an API is, nor do they know the difference between an NFPA and an AIChE. However, they do know that quality of life, health and safety are very important.
Those who were able to may have moved away from the area long ago, because even after so many accidents, they have not seen any of the improvements promised by senior executives at Formosa Plastics. The only thing they have received is pitifully minuscule compensation, which has led many people to say the group has taken advantage of local residents.
All large companies around the world are scrutinized by society to see whether they are socially responsible. The sixth naphtha cracker complex is Formosa Plastics’ biggest production base and if it really cares about corporate social responsibility (CSR), it should make it easier for local residents to obtain information pertaining to industrial safety and environmental protection.
It should even allow local residents to take a more direct part in testing and monitoring. In its 2009 report on CSR, Formosa Plastics listed a series of achievements in terms of industrial safety and environmental protection during 2009, but these claims now seem absurd and contradictory.
The government’s support of capitalists has caused companies to come up short in communication with, and concern for, local communities. Formosa Plastics should stop focusing only on the wishes of the central government’s economic agencies and begin to pay real attention to the interests of all stakeholders, especially the issues that concern local residents and company employees, since front-line employees are often the most direct victims of these industrial accidents.
After this latest incident, the resumption of operations at the plant may be postponed further, which could cause shareholders to incur more losses.
However, I would like to remind Formosa Plastics’ management that if it really wants to gain social trust, it needs to first ask its front-line employees and local residents near their factories how long it has been since they slept well at night.
Chen Tai-an is a lecturer in the Department of Environmental Resources Management at the Transworld Institute of Technology and a doctoral candidate in the marine environment and engineering at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS